PDA

View Full Version : Gravity, Electricity, and Magnetism



LightEye
05-03-2007, 12:57 PM
dear friends,

dan has added all kinds of new articles. this wasn't though posted 21st of april as appears at the site. i check his site every day.

http://www.halexandria.org/dward157.htm

be well, be love.

david

meissner field
new -- 21 april 2007

the meissner field is a magnetic field which, among other things, does not have the traditional north or south polarity. this is the reason many physicists strongly prefer to call it the meissner effect -- thus avoiding the issue of having a directionally challenged magnetic field. at the same time, however, the effect can not be dismissed inasmuch as edmunds scientific now sells kits with which to demonstrate the meissner effect. (the general sense is that when capitalism agrees on the reality of a physical phenomena, physicists quickly accept the inevitable.)

the meissner field (or effect) is produced when a superconductor has an external magnetic field applied to it -- with the strength of the meissner field/effect being dependent upon the initially applied external magnetic field. once the meissner effect has been initiated, it acts as a magnetic barrier and resists any further entry of an applied magnetic field into the superconductor. the effect is dramatic. once established the meissner field forces all other magnetic fields to effectively go around the superconductor, leaving the superconducting sample unaffected in terms of its superconductive characteristics.

if the external magnetic field is that of the earth, the meissner effect causes the sample in question to, at least in some cases, levitate. while, levitation is typically viewed as a magical trick or deception, it is clear that with the meissner effect it is a routine physical phenomena. the only requirement is the presence of superconductivity. but inasmuch as superconductivity is viewed by mainstream physics as a very low temperature phenomena, then it is clear -- based on the flawed assumption of what is currently known in physics prohibiting other processes -- that there can be no levitation at room temperature.

LightEye
05-06-2007, 11:19 AM
dear friends,

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanid=sa003&articleid=59179c8e-e7f2-99df-33e813ef3298bf71

be well, be love.

david

envision this: mathematicians design invisible tunnel
electromagnetic "wormhole" results from turning invisible sphere inside out
by jr minkel

call it harry potter's invisible sleeve. new calculations show how to make an electromagnetic "wormhole"—a tube that is invisible from the sides, allowing light to shine down the center unseen.

the concept is a twist on a spherical cloak of invisibility proposed last year. such a device would be made of metamaterial, a thicket of metal rings or other shapes that bends light in funny ways. a hollow shell of metamaterial could in principle channel light around its inner space without slowing the light down, rendering that hidey-hole invisible to the outside world.

but the invisibility cuts both ways. if light does not enter, then whatever is in the cloak cannot see outside, says mathematician allan greenleaf of the university of rochester.

LightEye
05-17-2007, 12:51 PM
dear friends,

http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/05/the_electric_force_of_a_curren.html

be well, be love.

david

the electric force of a current - 'back to basics' on electromagnetism

as happens so often in science, important works of pioneers are overlooked, suppressed, poorly understood and therefore remain unknown to students and professionals. prof. andre koch torres de assis of the university of campinas in brazil tells of such a case in his recent book, co-authored with julio akashi hernandes. the works of two german scientists - wilhelm weber and gustav kirchhoff - on fields that form around current carrying wires, are detailed in a new book titled the electric force of a current: weber and the surface charges of resistive conductors carrying steady currents.

the book is published by apeiron, montreal, it has 239 pages, the isbn number is 978-0-9732911-5-5. the paperback edition is also available from amazon.

a pdf of the book (5 mb) can be downloaded from assis' webpage, and the cover is available there as well.

according to a message from prof andre assis, the book is devoted to answer two main questions:


(a) is there a force between a resistive wire carrying a steady current and an external point charge when they are at rest relative to one another? in particular, is there a component of this force which depends upon the voltage of the battery connected to the circuit? this first question can also be phrased as: a stationary and resistive wire carrying a steady current generates an external electric field?

(b) is this wire neutral at its internal points and along its surface?



"in the first three chapters we present the opinions of many eminent scientists as regards these questions. then we present theoretical reasons and experimental results showing why the answer to the first question is affirmative and the answer to the second question is negative, contrary to many statements against these points of view. these first few chapters should be of interest to most readers.

we then present many analytical calculations of this force and distribution of surface charges in important configurations of steady currents: (straight wire, coaxial cable, transmission line, solenoid, toroidal conductor). we compare the calculations with many experimental results.

we include two appendices discussing the pioneering works of wilhelm weber and gustav kirchhoff. they showed the necessity of these surface charges in resistive wires carrying steady currents. weber was the first to try to calculate their distribution for a straight wire and for a ring. at the end of the book we quote 259 references related to this topic.

i take this opportunity to inform that weber’s main work in which he derived his force law from ampere’s force between current elements is now available in english translation. this is only the first of a specific series of 8 large papers published by weber, with the series dedicated to electromagnetic measurements. weber’s force depends not only upon the distance between the interacting charges, but also upon their relative velocity and their relative acceleration. complete english translation in pdf format (2.2 mb):

http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/weber_1846.pdf

weber’s work discussed in the appendix quoted above is the second paper of this series."

andre koch torres assis

clearly, this is not a book for all readers, but some of you may be interested in the specific problems it discusses.

LightEye
06-29-2007, 11:45 AM
dear friends,

http://physorg.com/news102333567.html

be well, be love.

david

pioneering 3d view of near-earth magnetic 'dance'

scientists have obtained the first-ever 3d picture of interconnected magnetic ‘dances’ in near-earth space, known as magnetic reconnection events.

the data from esa’s cluster satellites will help to understand better magnetic reconnection, a process related to star formation, solar explosions and the entry of solar wind energy into the near-earth environment.

magnetic reconnection is the process whereby magnetic field lines from different magnetic domains collide and reconnect, mixing previously separated plasma. plasma is a gas composed of ions and electrons but is electrically neutral, spread over large distances in space and guided by the action of magnetic and electric fields.

magnetic reconnection converts the energy of the magnetic field into particle energy, generating jets and heating the plasma.

this affects us here on earth because it can possibly affect telecom satellites and prevent the efficient production of electricity in controlled fusion reactors. on earth, we can also see the effect in more intense displays of the northern lights.

LightEye
07-04-2007, 11:13 AM
dear friends,

http://montalk.net/notes/the-etheric-origins-of-gravity-electricity-and-magnetism

be well, be love.

david

the etheric origins of gravity, electricity, and magnetism

07/04/2007 there is a beautiful unity underlying gravity, electricity, and magnetism. the unity may be expressed mathematically, but here it will be shown visually because doing so allows a quicker and more direct understanding of the underlying geometric reality that mathematical abstraction often obscures.

these diagrams show how electric, magnetic, gravitational, and potential fields all arise from various kinds of distortions in a single field called the scalar superpotential. this field is also know as the ether, or the medium in which everything physical exists.

the term “scalar” just means that each coordinate in the field is associated with a single measurement value. the way this value varies over space and time determines what kind of secondary field arises from the superpotential. the unit of measurement is the weber, which is a unit of pure magnetic flux.

in these diagrams, each circle represents a particular value of superpotential. circles of different sizes indicate different superpotential values. circles made of dashed lines signify superpotential values that vary over time.

LightEye
07-04-2007, 12:53 PM
dear friends,

dw mentions this.

here's an interesting article which support dw's article.

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/gravity2.htm

be well, be love.

david

gravity and antigravity
david pratt
b 2001, last rev’d jul 2007
part 2 of 2

contents
4. levitation and technology
5. human levitation
6. theosophical writings

4. levitation and technology

myths and megaliths

the megalithic structures found at many sites around the world have generated endless controversy as to how they were built. conventional archaeologists, who dismiss the possibility of highly advanced civilizations in the remote past, insist that they were built solely with the use of primitive tools and brute force. some of the structures, or parts of them, could have been built in this way. however, a number of engineers have stated that some features would be difficult if not impossible to duplicate today, even using the most advanced technology. the sheer weight and size of some of the stone blocks have prompted several researchers to wonder whether the ancient builders had mastered some form of levitation technology.*

*the acoustic and magnetic levitation techniques currently under development by mainstream scientists create a physical lifting force stronger than the force of gravity and do not modify gravity or generate an antigravitational force.

the pre-incan fortresses at ollantaytambo and sacsayhuaman in the peruvian andes consist of cyclopean walls constructed from tight-fitting polygonal stone blocks, some weighing 120 tonnes or more. the blocks used at ollantaytambo were somehow transported from a quarry located on another mountaintop 11 km away, the descent from which was impeded by a river canyon with 305-metre vertical rock walls. the ruins of tiahuanaco (tiwanaku) near lake titicaca in bolivia include blocks weighing around 100 tonnes, which were transported from quarries 50 km away.1 according to the local aymara indians, the complex was built at the ‘beginning of time’ by the founder-god viracocha and his followers, who caused the stones to be ‘carried through the air to the sound of a trumpet’. an alternative theme is that they created a ‘heavenly fire’ that consumed the stones and enabled large blocks to be lifted by hand ‘as if they were cork’. according to a mayan legend, the temple complex of uxmal in the yucatan peninsula was built by a race of dwarfs who were able to move heavy rocks into place by whistling.2

legends of occult power being employed to lift and transport stone blocks are in fact universal. for example, according to tradition the megalithic city of nan madol on the micronesian island of pohnpei was built by the god-kings olosopa and olosipa, who used magic spells to make the huge stones ‘fly through the air like birds’.3 legends about the huge stone statues or moai on easter island, many of which are as high as a three-storey building, tell how magicians or priests used mana, or mind power, to make them ‘walk’, or float through the air.4

according to early greek historians, the walls of the ancient city of thebes were built by amphion, a son of jupiter, who moved the large stones ‘to the music of his harp’ while his ‘songs drew even stones and beasts after him’. another version claims that when he played ‘loud and clear on his golden lyre, rock twice as large followed in his footsteps’. the 10th-century arab historian mas’di wrote that, to build the pyramids, the ancient egyptians inserted papyri inscribed with certain characters beneath the stone blocks; they were then struck by an instrument, producing a sound which caused them to rise into the air and travel for a distance of over 86 metres.5

the achievements of the ancient egyptian builders have caused even some fairly orthodox investigators to wonder whether levitation might have been employed.6 for instance the roof of the king’s chamber in the great pyramid, 200 feet up, consists of huge granite beams weighing up to 70 tonnes. what’s more, the major temples on the giza plateau – the two next to the sphinx and those besides the second and third pyramids – contain colossal limestone blocks weighing between 50 and 200 tonnes and placed on top of one another. the largest are 9 metres long, 3.6 metres wide and 3.6 metres high. it is interesting to note that there are only a few cranes in the world today capable of lifting objects weighing 200 tonnes or more.7

the largest blocks used in any known man-made structure are found in the ancient platform beneath the roman temple of jupiter at baalbek in lebanon.8 the foundation platform is enclosed by a cyclopean retaining wall; in the western side, on the fifth level, at a height of 10 metres, there are three colossal stones known as the trilithon, each measuring about 19.5 metres long, 4.5 metres high and 3.5 metres deep, and weighing a staggering 1000 tonnes. the stones fit together perfectly and not even a knife blade can be pushed between them. at the quarry, half a kilometre away, there remains a fourth, even larger block, weighing as much as 1200 tonnes, the lower part of its base still attached to the bedrock. the course beneath the trilithon contains seven mammoth stones weighing about 450 tonnes each.

there are no traces of a roadbed leading from the quarry and no traces of any ramp. nor are there any written records as to how the platform was built. according to local arab legend, baalbek’s first citadel was built before the flood, and rebuilt afterwards by a race of giants. the phoenician historian sanchoniatho stated that lebanon’s first city was byblos, founded by the god ouranus, who designed cyclopean structures and was able to make stones move as if they had a life of their own.

Chris Hamilton
07-15-2007, 05:29 PM
post new articles of scientific interest here for gravity and electromagnetic theories.

phireflye
09-09-2007, 11:51 AM
"the casimir force is a consequence of quantum mechanics, the theory that describes the world of atoms and subatomic particles that is not only the most successful theory of physics but also the most baffling.

the force is due to neither electrical charge or gravity, for example, but the fluctuations in all-pervasive energy fields in the intervening empty space between the objects and is one reason atoms stick together, also explaining a “dry glue” effect that enables a gecko to walk across a ceiling.

now, using a special lens of a kind that has already been built, prof ulf leonhardt and dr thomas philbin report in the new journal of physics they can engineer the casimir force to repel, rather than attact."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...evitate106.xml

LightEye
10-09-2007, 01:22 PM
dear friends,

great work from gary. make sure you check out the article "cycle diagrams" for more info.

http://www.freewebs.com/garyosborn/dimensiondoorways.htm

be well, be love.

david

dimension doorways
by gary osborn 2003

copyright © gary osborn 2003. all rights reserved

space-time-lines

there has been some important practical research done recently regarding the earth’s energy meridians, known as ‘ley-lines,’ (english) ‘fairy paths,’ (irish) ‘dragon paths,’ (chinese) and ‘song lines,’ (australian aborigine.)

the first research into ‘ley lines’ in modern times was attempted by alfred watkins, who first coined the term “ley” in 1921.

two pioneers in this area, who have published their findings in recent years, are paul broadhurst and hamish miller: the sun and the serpent, (1989), and the dance of the dragon, (2000).

the existence of these ‘leys’ is still being debated between researchers and scientists. however, like the human mind that can perceive and contemplate their existence, ‘leys’ cannot be measured: our present understanding is that they are “conduits” of infinite energy that only become extant when we find many different sites or famous landmarks linked together in a straight line - these alignments originally based on what our distant ancestors had found perhaps through psychic means - i.e., dowsing. we could think of leys as neutral-zero null-lines.

before we go onto the subject of ‘leys’ and the earth’s lines of force, we are going to look at wave phenomena.

what follows is perhaps how our ancient ancestors understood the dynamic driving force in all wave phenomena and in their own simple way. see also cycle diagrams. (click on ouroborus image entitled cycle diagrams).

LightEye
10-15-2007, 11:29 AM
dear friends,

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/column.php?id=108666

be well, be love.

david

plasma vortexes
column: plasma metaphysics

jay alfred: it was noted in the author's article bioplasma bodies: formation of the central pranic and kundalini currents that the helical currents generate an axial magnetic field which is aligned with the spine. this axial magnetic field is really the "straight" part of a dipole magnetic field. for convenience, we will designate the location of the "north" pole of this magnetic field to above the human head and the "south" pole below the groin. the magnetic flux lines of this magnetic field will flare outwards at the north pole, circle the bioplasma body and enter the south pole. within the bioplasma body, the field lines from the south pole will move upwards towards the north pole. the part of the magnetic field that is within the bioplasma body is fairly straight and uniform. the polar vortexes are plasma vortexes that form around the north and south poles. the north polar vortex of a person who is standing would be facing the sky and the south polar vortex would be facing the ground.

LightEye
10-21-2007, 11:34 AM
dear friends,

http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212110242.shtml

be well, be love.

david

are we close to the next scientific revolution?
by cher murphy

austin, texas -- (october 5, 2007) --it was a beautiful summer day in 1995 in castro valley, calif., when dr. eue j. jeong, a physicist from the university of michigan was reading a book containing the famous alien abduction story of antonio villas boas. according to boas' story that happened in mexico in 1957, this "flying star" approached his position, growing in size until it became recognizable as a roughly circular or egg-shaped aerial craft, with a red light at its front and a rotating cupola on top.

out of casual curiosity, dr. jeong wondered what was so special about the rotating hemisphere (cupola). he was curious if that can have anything to do with their propulsion system. after noticing that there can be nothing obviously special about it, he questioned "how about the center of mass?" he immediately performed the mathematical integration in his mind on the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere, using the special relativistic mass increase effect.

he found that the calculated center of mass of the rotating hemisphere shifted, because of the asymmetry and the velocity dependent mass increase effect. but for the center of mass of an object to be shifted, there must be some kind of an external force in the direction of the shift, he thought. but there was only a spin rotation that caused the shift of the center of mass, which seemed impossible to him. he realized the cause and the result didn't match in the mechanical system of the rotating hemisphere. he could not believe what he was witnessing, after all of his years of experience in physics training.

Cruise4
12-02-2007, 03:41 AM
bruce is a researcher & speaker who has published many books about the earth grid, ufo's, harmonic frequencies & the nature of reality.

bruce has also developed a software program that lets you plot the exact location of the earth grid, allowing you to find earth energy points in your immediate surroundings.

http://www.brucecathie.com/

extract:
einstein's own equation of relativity gets very close to this unified field in and of itself. almost everyone knows that the equation reads energy equals mass times the speed of light (c) squared, or e=mc2. what einstein hoped to do was to solve this equation for the speed of light alone. he believed that the value for mass could eventually be substituted as a measurement of light. if this was done, then all of creation could be expressed as being made up of pure light - mass and energy entirely a function of light. this is the true "unified field" that einstein was searching for.

as amazing as it must sound, cathie solved this problem. in the grid, he discovered an expression of mass that was phrased in terms of the speed of light. at the end of this chapter, we will print his solution, but we will not try to discuss it because of its complexity. (more adventuresome authors might try to rephrase these complex arguments into their own words, so that they are not just flat-out plagiarizing cathie's own work.) so, even though cathie "cracked the code" of the unified field theory, what is actually more interesting and important to us is the discoveries that he made along the way! as cathie approached the solution to the puzzle, he unearthed some fundamental discoveries that forever change our understanding of "sympathetic vibrational physics."

http://www.dprins.demon.nl/convergence/9915.html [moderator note: this is one section of our david wilcock's e-book "convergence", copied in its entirety at the dprins.demon.nl site. this site does give credit to david, it just doesn't appear on the page cruise4 has linked to]

the stunning, arresting and incontrovertible truth of cathie's findings, (mirrored by synchronicity just now on the author's clock,) is that the "grid speed of light" is - you guessed it - exactly 144,000 minutes of arc per grid second in free space.

exactly what does this mean? quite simple, actually. the fundamental, harmonic value for the speed of light is precisely the same as the fundamental harmonic values for the following:

the mayan calendar's baktun, at 144,000 earth days;
the bible number of the 144,000 souls who will ascend;
the fundamental "building block" of all sound vibration frequencies, 144;
the fundamental gematrian "frequency number" for light, 144;
and, of course, the harmonic of 12 times 12.

Cruise4
12-02-2007, 03:42 AM
school of ra math
i came across this but only had time for a quick scan. are there any numerology people able to evaluate this ra math stuff? what leapt out to me was it combines colours, sounds and mathematics which suggests multi-dimensional to my untrained eye..

could be rubbish

in the fall of 1975, while engaged in alpha brain wave biofeedback research, i rediscovered a natural system of mathematics that nature uses to describe itself.

http://www.geocities.com/capecanaver...oflearning.htm

the term rediscovered is used here because later research revealed that the same system of mathematics was employed thousands of years ago in the geometrical designs of the first, second and third largest pyramids located in giza, egypt. the megalithic structure located in england known as stonehenge and in the buildings and spatial layout of the pre-columbian cities of tiahuanaco, bolivia, as well as teotihuacan and palenque,mexico.

research of others has linked this natural system to the dimensions of the apparent buildings, five-sided pyramid and gigantic carved human head that are located on the cydonia plain of the planet mars.

because the geometry of the great pyramid of giza helped me to acquire my present understanding, i named the rediscovered mathematics the ra system, after the ancient egyptian sun god amon ra. the natural units of measure derived from the system, are now referred to as the rods of amon ra.

as a result of this rediscovery, i originally set my findings down in a three-volume (four books) series entitled the rods of amon ra. the last version of this work was privately published in 1993. over the past five years, the ra knowledge has increased considerably.

i am presently updating the ra series so as to include new data and my present understanding of the ra system. the present body of ra information is definitely contrary to the prevailing scientific belief that the egyptian pyramids and other ancient buildings located elsewhere were built by primitive people. in fact, the ra information supplies irrefutable evidence that the geometrical designs of these ancient structures were the product of a culture that possessed vast knowledge of nature and also an advanced understanding of quantum physics.

it has taken more than 23 years of research to unravel the complexities of the ra system. thousands upon thousands of calculations were made with the use of electronic calculators and countless hours were spent studying the reported measurements of ancient building such as the great pyramid in order to bring the ra system out of obscurity and back into the realm of human understanding. whoever in the ancient past (of this world or another), originally recognized the existence of the ra system of mathematics had to be extremely intelligent and highly perceptive. after the system's original discovery, a study of its relationships to such things as the dynamic functions of the various atoms had to be conducted. a study in this area of physics would require instruments such as a spectroscope and the knowledge of infrared and ultraviolet photography, as well as some form of electronic recording and retrieval device.

there is absolutely no evidence that egyptians of the 4th dynasty (2700 bc - 2400 bc) possessed such a technology. in addition, those who originally discovered the ra system thereafter, (with a definite purpose in mind), used it to design pyramid shaped structures of immense size and actually construct them. i am very sure that these pyramids were not intended to be tombs. the design and the constructions must have taken considerable time to plan and execute. this was not accomplished overnight. most likely, a technology that was developed out of the full knowledge of the ra system was used to cut and lift the estimated 2,700,000 massive stone blocks, (some weighing as much as 70 tons), of the egyptian pyramids to great heights.

http://www.geocities.com/capecanaver...oflearning.htm

Cruise4
12-02-2007, 03:43 AM
new perspectives on the great pyramid

http://sonic.net/bernard/pyramid.html

[moderator: this article was written by bernard pietsch]

extracts:
the purity of the indicated space above the physical top of the pyramid is not of this world. each individual must recreate its existence. it is truly a sacred space—eternal, incorruptible, and timeless. but its latent potential must be supported in the world in order to be realized.

this is the first indication that the great pyramid is indeed a model of man. the message is: man is "locked" to the earth through his biology and that biology is cosmically correlated with his planetary evolution. this is the primary understanding.

we contend that it was known to the builder almost 5,000 years ago, where on the earth the pyramid was located, where in the solar system and where in the galaxy. the design and position of the great pyramid indicate that the architect of cheops utilized all three of the above frameworks and one other. this fourth framework is a living, moving, changing framework. it is simultaneously the largest framework we can conceive and the most immediate. it is magnetic.viii

our thesis presumes that the missing link between the science of today and that of the pyramid builders (and other ancient architects) is the knowledge and use of a magnetic framework.

the magnetic value of a location is integral to the selection of sites chosen as "sacred" in earliest times. monuments were linked with the heavens by astronomical alignments, and to the earth by identification with their magnetic orientation. modernly this orientation is defined as the magnetic dip and declination of the earth’s magnetic field. the dip and declination values of any location are constantly progressing westward, so that marking a location at a specific time would have been an important feature of the monument as marker.

[to conform to our length guidelines, please click on link above to read the rest of the article]

Cruise4
12-02-2007, 04:59 AM
secrets of the hebrew letters

http://www.meru.org/press/atlantisrising.html

he says the hebrew bible is arranged similarly to a hologram: the first letter contains the whole, the first word expands on the first letter, the first sentence upon the first word, etc. "it's very much like what our scientists do," he says. "we include information with messages sent to outer space that explains how to decode the entire message-that's also how compression programs work on computers." he also believes the hebrew bible contains a function similar to the mathematical purpose of pi, and links consciousness and physicality the way pi links the radius and circumference of a circle: "our radius is our physicality and the circumference is our life, our emotions," he says. "the ancient hebrew alphabet is far more than a tool for everyday communication or the transmission of sacred texts; the letter forms themselves have intrinsic geometric and mathematical properties that point us to a profound knowledge of life and the nature of human consciousness." tenen feels there are principles of law and order in the relationship between humans and the cosmos that, up till now, only pythagoreans and kabbalists have suspected. "what i've found," says tenen, "is that these principles correspond to the numerical patterns of some of the basic geometrical forms found in the physical world. for example, the double helix, which is the form of the dna molecule."

Cruise4
12-02-2007, 05:06 AM
coral castle code broken

ed leedskalnin left behind the blueprints of nature,
a secret knowledge of the ancients. it is the base
for all structure in creation. i discovered the clue
ed leedskalnin left for the world.this will be the
first time people can see the genius behind this
man who learned nature's biggest secret.
[specific coral castle url does not work]

coral castle link: http://www.coralcastle.com/

he is not the only one with these ideas:
http://www.vortexpluswater.com/vortex_mechanics.htm [moderator: this url does not work]

http://www.vortexscience.com/index.php

tibetan sound levitation of large stones witnessed by scientist
http://www.crystalinks.com/levitationtibet.html

quotes j. cathie, a captain flying with national airways corp. of new zealand, as saying: “measurements from the coral castle position to the zero-degree and 90-degree longitude lines, when they passed through the equator, also yielded harmonics related to light and gravity. the final check of the distance between coral castle and grid pole a in the north, dispelled any doubt about the site being in an ideal position to allow leedskalnin to erect the huge blocks of coral with relative ease. measurements from all major points gave the geometric harmonics necessary for the manipulation of anti-gravity.” cathie also believes that this energy grid is also responsible for many ufo sightings.

LightEye
12-02-2007, 11:56 AM
dear friends,

http://montalk.net/science/115/earth-grid-research

be well, be love.

david

earth grid research
montalk.net :: (cc) 28 november 07
version 0.3 :: nov 27, 2007
original :: jun 2006

update: you can now use a convenient web interface to generate google earth files that show earth overlaid with one of the five platonic solids (or the becker-hagens grid) with all vertices connected by lines. simply visit the following two links and follow the instructions.

google earthgrid (coordinates)
goole earthgrid (bearing)

this does away with having to download and install the python framework. now you can just use your browser to punch in grid alignment coordinates and receive a link to download the google earth .kml file. if you still want to use the python script, see the section in this article titled “computer program”.

summary

this is a quick write-up of my ongoing research into the earth grid. skip to the next section if you wish to bypass my technical speculation on the nature of gridpoints.

within the spherical center of large masses is a neutral center. john keely worked extensively with the vibrational neutral centers of resonating masses. i define the neutral center as a point at which the gravitational field sums to zero but gravitational potential is quite high. if sufficiently high, time slows to a crawl and becomes imaginary, meaning spacetime breaks down and opens a window into other dimensions and densities. the cassiopaeans said the centers of stars and planets are windows.

neutral centers can be created electromagnetically via radially converging or diverging electric current pulses, spherical standing waves in piezoelectric materials, or via the radial null vectors of large masses as described above.

the earth’s own neutral center is a dimensional window that vibrates at frequencies resonant with the earth’s own spherical harmonics. i’m not certain whether these spherical harmonics correlate to mechanical, electromagnetic, or gravitational vibrations. whatever the case, standing waves are set up that create equally spaced node and antinodal points on earth’s surface. these points are spaced in various configurations matching the platonic solids: tetrahedron, octahedron, cube, icosahedron, and dodecahedron.

these standing waves pull from the central dimensional window multiple vortical conduits. unlike a neutral center which has a null point in the middle of a sphere, these vortical conduits have a null axis inside a tubular vortex. they pierce the earth’s surface at the aforementioned node or antinode points.

thus, there are dimensional window points spaced equally apart on the earth’s surface – these are the primary earth grid points and correspond to the vertices of the platonic solids. their electromagnetic configuration includes little if any magnetic, electric, or gravitational components except in special circumstances at special times. their primary electromagnetic structure consists of potential fields, both magnetic, electric, and gravitational potential, which are not easily detectable.

based on calculations, one possible magnetic profile of such a conduit should consist of circular magnetic fields that are weakest at the center and increase in magnitude with distance from the center, a vector plot looking similar to how wheat is laid down in crop circles. this is exactly the reverse of how ordinary magnetic fields behave, which drop off with distance instead. this “reverse magnetism” was hinted by the annotators of the book case for the ufo in regards to gridpoints.

wicherink
12-02-2007, 01:08 PM
the bethe hagens grid for google earth can be downloaded here:

http://www.vortexmaps.com/hagens-grid-google.php

good luck
jan

LightEye
12-25-2007, 01:22 PM
dear friends,

http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/issues/nature.php

be well, be love.

david

topical issues: nature

our natural world is under assault from human activity. the trouble is, to recognise damage to nature reveals also the risk to ourselves. ‘progress’ is in the hands not of individual people, nor their elected representatives and politicians. it is in the hands of the free market, the large corporates who set the direction of our world through creating profit streams however they can. we don’t have to identify this as evil; rather it is almost inevitable. we are persuaded of the benefits of convenience and consumerism, and we are the source of the profits and the stimulant to corporate behaviour and the setters of social trends. what we must do is to observe, to ask questions, and be honest enough with ourselves to recognise that nothing we do is without consequence. if we are custodians of our children’s futures, we must accept individual and joint responsibility for the condition of our planet.



birds, magnetic and electromagnetic fields
mobile phone masts blamed over the vanishing sparrows
mobile phones and vanishing birds (institute of science in society)
a possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (passer domesticus), joris everaert, dirk bauwens (electromagnetic biology and medicine, volume 26, issue 1, january 2007)
the urban decline of the house sparrow (passer domesticus): a possible link with electromagnetic radiation, alfonso balmori, örjan hallberg (electromagnetic biology and medicine, volume 26, issue 2, april 2007)
us and german scientists have shown that oscillating magnetic fields disrupt the magnetic orientation behaviour of migratory birds (ritz t et al. ‘resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass’, nature 2004, may 13, vol 429, p. 177). migratory birds are known to use the geomagnetic field as a source of compass information and there are two competing hypotheses for the primary process underlying the avian magnetic compass, one involving magnetite, the other a magnetically sensitive, chemical reaction (see links below).

the researchers found that robins were disoriented when exposed to a vertically aligned, broadband (0.1-10 mhz) or a single-frequency (7-mhz) field in addition to the geomagnetic field. in the 7-mhz oscillating field, this effect depended on the angle between the oscillating and the geomagnetic fields. the birds exhibited seasonally appropriate, migratory orientation when the oscillating field was parallel to the geomagnetic field, but were disoriented when it was presented at a 24- or 48-degree angle.

the authors state that their results are consistent with a resonance effect on singlet-triplet transitions and suggest a magnetic compass based on a radical-pair mechanism. they comment:

‘the magnetic compass of birds is light-dependent and exhibits strong lateralization with input coming primarily from the right eye. however, the primary biophysical process underlying this compass remains unexplained. magnetite, as well as biochemical radical-pair reactions have been hypothesized to mediate sensitivity to earth-strength, magnetic fields through fundamentally different physical mechanisms.’

in the magnetite-based mechanism, magnetic fields exert mechanical forces. in the radical-pair mechanism, the magnetic field alters the dynamics of transitions between spin states, after the creation of a radical pair through a light-induced electron transfer. these transitions in turn affect reaction rates and products. although in most radical-pair reactions the effects of earth-strength magnetic fields are masked by a living system’s background ‘noise’, model calculations show that such effects can be amplified beyond the level of background ‘noise’ in specialized, radical-pair receptor systems.

LightEye
01-20-2008, 11:39 AM
dear friends,

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/column.php?id=116975

be well, be love.

david

shc - "lightning discharge" hypothesis
column: plasma metaphysics
posted on sunday, 20 january, 2008 | 5:13

jay alfred: plasma metaphysics' "lightning discharge" hypothesis, proposed in this author's article is shc caused by electrical discharges? published on march 26, 2007 on this website, has received further support from recent research. in the article, jay alfred proposed that spontaneous human combustion is caused by electrical discharges, similar to lightning discharges, within the body. the article states, "a bolt of lightning is an electrical discharge within this system. according to plasma metaphysics, the same phenomenon that occurs in space and on earth can occur within our subtle bodies... the energies of our subtle (high energy) magma bodies far exceed anything the biomolecular body can withstand. " in december 2007 researchers at the university of michigan discovered, to their surprise, "electric fields inside cells as strong as those produced in lightning bolts". however, "scientists are not clear as to what causes these strong fields or what they might mean."

the body's unexplained electromagnetic field

the researchers, led by chemistry professor raoul kopelman, used voltage-sensitive dyes injected into polymer spheres just 30 nanometers in diameter. when illuminated with blue light, the voltage-sensitive dyes within the nano-particles emitted a mixture of red and green light. since the exact frequency of light emitted is influenced by the strength of the local electric field, this gave the researchers a way to measure the strength of the field. using these nano-particles, kopelman found electric fields as strong as 15 million volts per meter in the internal fluid of brain-cancer cells. this is five times stronger than the electric field found in a lightning bolt.

the existence of strong electric fields across cellular membranes is accepted as a basic fact of cell biology. maintaining gradients of charged molecules and ions allows for many cellular functions, from control over cell volume to the electrical discharges of nerve and muscle cells. however, the fact that cells appear to have powerful internal electric fields has surprised scientists. kopelman presented his results at the 47th annual meeting of the american society for cell biology in december 2007. "there has been no skepticism as to the measurements," says kopelman, "but we don't have an interpretation."
these background electric fields in the body provide evidence of a (counter-part) bioplasma body that is coupled with the physical-carbon based body. a bioplasma body generates electromagnetic fields. according to plasma metaphysics, bioplasma cells co-evolved with physical-carbon cells (see the author's article on plasma life forms - dark panspermia, 2007). the fact that these electric fields, discovered by kopelman, cannot be accounted for by scientists using the limited model of an isolated physical-carbon based body shows that the bioplasma body, which has been referred to as the (lower) "physical-etheric" body in the metaphysical literature and which forms the basis for the study of chinese acupuncture, can be studied and progressively verified only as current technology improves.

however, this is not the first time that mysterious background electric fields have been noticed. robert becker, harold burr and others have also documented a pattern of voltage gradients over the body that is consistent with chinese acupuncture points but is difficult to explain based on current scientific theories. the earth, too, has an unexplained background electromagnetic field.

ace ota
01-21-2008, 01:09 PM
i wonder if this is the same energy field that tesla was trying to tap into with his devices?

from the looks of it, there is indeed a vast amounts of energy within the air itself.

maybe most of the so called 'free energy' machines gained their power from these em fields?:cool:

interesting read nontheless.



love & peace

ace

weboy78
01-27-2008, 11:42 AM
by reanalyzing the basic equation of general relativity--which treats space and time as a stretchy membrane--a physicist has discovered that magnetic fields tend to flatten and stiffen the fabric of space-time. the discovery might force cosmologists and astronomers to reexamine how magnetic fields have shaped the evolution of the cosmos.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/292/5525/2230a [note: this brings up an article on headaches-so maybe weboy can fix this]

http://focus.aps.org/story/v7/st27

LightEye
01-28-2008, 02:12 AM
dear friends,

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,druck-531023,00.html

be well, be love.

david

a new look into the center of the earth
by hilmar schmundt

for years, scientists have known that continents float around on the earth's surface like ice bergs on the ocean. but what happens deep beneath our feet? a new theory envisions graveyards for continents and a life cycle not unlike the weather.

he dispenses with the usual japanese greeting ritual. business cards presented with both hands, bowing, drinking tea -- there's no time for such formalities. he has to explain the history of the planet, nearly five billion years, in just one hour.

Metamike
01-28-2008, 09:55 AM
thunderbolts project
update
january 26, 2008
new video--"velikovsky, hero or villain?"

i received this e-mail notice on my computer today. i took a look at the film and a couple of thoughts came to mind. first off, i am not a scientist. i am, however, well informed about some of the more cutting edge theories about cosmology, energy, planetary changes etc. i do some research on my own. velikovsky’s work is something i have read about in the books published by david wilcock. i have followed the thunderbolts theories and am also aware of neil adams work. all of these things tie together as they should if they are true. as above, so is below. this is a principle that i am sure any unified theory of the universe will show to be true.

velikovsky’s theories about the planets changing orbit make a lot of sense. let’s include the channeled material by ra, which can be found on divine cosmos - web site for david wilcock - reality is composed of a number of different densities of awareness. each energy level is distinctly different from the others. even the speed of light is different. according to ra, the earth, and our entire solar system is due to be remagnatized from third density to fourth density around the time between 2011 and 2012. this is popularly known as ascension. apparently there is research from russia that concurs with the idea that our planetary system is traveling through a highly energized part of space and this is the main reason for planetary changes. dr. nikolai a. kozyrev has confirmed aether as the pre-energy and mater substance in third density.

if this is correct, and i personally believe it is, it would stand to reason that just like electrons shifting their orbit all at once - which quanta physics suggests, why not planets in their orbit around the sun. wouldn’t this be an example of so as below, so is above?

another interesting point...neil adams suggests that the spinning planets and moons grow in size due to the transforming of aether energy to matter. i read this between the lines at any rate. i have done an experiment that might seem to suggest that he is very right. i have one of those glass balls with a high voltage source that generates those strings of electric plasma, when turned on. when i bought it, the glass was crystal clear. after watching a thunderbolts film about plasma in the universe, i turned my plasma ball on and have kept it on for several weeks. i have noticed a white film that has covered the entire glass. is this an example of the same kind of manifestation of physical matter from a vacuum, with a plasma?

David Wilcock
01-28-2008, 10:26 AM
i turned my plasma ball on and have kept it on for several weeks. i have noticed a white film that has covered the entire glass. is this an example of the same kind of manifestation of physical matter from a vacuum, with a plasma?

sorry to burst your plasma ball, but this is simply the result of the ionization of dust particles in the room, which are then attracted to the glass and become attached there. it's the same thing you get with ozone generators and why you need to keep cleaning the plates that generate the plasma.

nonetheless they are fun... i used to have one called the illuma-storm.

- david

Metamike
01-28-2008, 10:40 AM
"this is presumably the outer edge of the earth's heavy core, where the temperature is 4,000 degrees celsius (7,200 degrees fahrenheit)." quote from link.
nice article, interesting, but what can we speculate from what we know? ed leedskalnin, the builder of the coral castle in florida had some interesting ideas about magnetism. they don't agree with mainstream scientific understanding, but his ideas make more sense than other alternatives. he contends that there is a two way flow of particles, north to south and south to north. his contention is that magnet n&s plus a neutral particle is what the universe is made of. anyway...we get this vortex of energy flowing into each pole, meeting in the core of the earth. we know that the earth is magnetic and that its rotation generates enormous amounts of electricity. the only way i can comprehend magnetics coming from a heat source that is 4,000 c - is not from iron which cannot keep magnetism when hot, but plasma. this is the only known way to combine heat and magnetism - just like the sun.

i wonder how condensed the plasma could be at that temperature and pressure. i am sure this model can be extended to other planetary and sun sources. it looks like we need to consider electrics, plasma and magnetism as the rulers of the physical universe. if the earth, someday, should die - in a spiritual sense, i would imagine that the plasma interior would cool off and the pressure would dissipate living a hollow interior. that couldn't happen if the earth's core was molten iron.

just a thought.
mike from norway:)

weboy78
02-09-2008, 09:09 AM
http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/16-02-2006/76045-0

spaceships of the future to take humans to mars in 2.5 hours

“the german physicists build their work on a theory formulated by the german scientist burkhard heim. the theory was put together in the 1950s,” says vadim pimenov, deputy director of the institute of theoretical and applied physics under the russian academy of sciences, professor at the lomonosov moscow state university. “heim, a brilliant physicist and philosopher, was the first scientist who began thinking over the principles of space flights using a “hyper-engine.”

the concept seems improbable at first sight. in actuality, it is a byproduct of the efforts aiming to combine the quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity – two theories that so far have successfully foiled all the attempts to make them “friendly,” mostly due to differences in the interpretation of space and time. heim made use of the einstein concept regarding gravitation as a manifestation of distortions in the “fabric” of space and time. however, he suggested that all kinds of fundamental interaction be considered a manifestation of the complete set of spatial dimensions.

heim introduced two additional dimensions since the existing ones were not enough for proving his theory. the physicist reportedly proved that gravitation and electromagnetism could combine in his 6-d space. he also maintained that a gravitational force could turn into an electromagnetic one, and vice versa, under certain conditions. it is still unclear whether heim succeeded in combining the quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity. for reasons unknown, the scientist refused to made public all details of his theory until he carried out a “decisive” experiment. the experiment did not materialize either due to technical reasons or a lack of funds..

weboy78
07-10-2008, 08:50 AM
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2221277/boffins-superconductivity

scientists at the university of cambridge have published details of a key breakthrough in unravelling the mystery of room temperature superconductivity.

a paper in today's edition of nature claims that materials which could potentially transport electricity with zero loss (resistance) at room temperature hold "vast potential".

some of the possible applications include supercomputers, magnetically levitated trains, efficient magnetic resonance imaging, and lossless power generators, transformers and transmission lines.

creating such materials has long eluded scientists, but the materials that are known to superconduct at the highest temperatures are ceramic insulators that behave as magnets before 'doping'.

Metamike
07-11-2008, 01:39 AM
nassir haramein has a very interesting take on a unified field theory that really makes sense. there is an 8 hr. film of his work on the internet. in general he says that the universe works more like a fractal. we have two types of infinity. the expanding forces radiate their energy to the vacuum of space. the vacuum is actually the contracting infinity which absorbs this radiant energy. this infinite contracting is "singularity". this is where the source of "0" point energy is. haramein explains how he predicted that all galaxies are driven by a black hole - where we find singularity which is the motor of the galaxy. similarly there is a singularity at the heart of every star, planet, moon, and atom. this is the motor of the universe. he goes on to explain, and here is where i find a connection with david's work, how the tetrahydron geometry with a sphere around it is the very symbol of the expanding and contracting universe working together. he has made an animation showing how the double torus works and how, when viewed from the right angles, it looks like a spinning vortex, a galaxy and the ying/yang symbol. he gets quite deep into the symbolism of lost knowledge and how the connections are made to a "law of one".

all in all, this means that the earth is driven by its own black hole. this is why the earth keeps on spinning and radiating energy 70 more than it is getting from the sun. back to what i wrote earlier about magnetics. it still makes sense - two vortexes moving in opposite directions -north and south magnetic particles meeting at singularity in the middle of the earth.

this connects with schoubergers work too - two opposing vortexes, one constructive one destructive/radiant and contracting energies. i think we are getting close to discovering how the universe really works.

LightEye
08-23-2008, 01:38 PM
dear friends,

http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=89xdcmfs

be well, be love.

david

22 august 2008
electric gravity in an electric universe

“..if a special geometry has to be invented in order to account for a falling apple, even newton might be appalled at the complications which would ensue when really difficult problems are tackled.” [1] — sir oliver lodge, frs, 1921.

[this news item is shortened and modified from a presentation given in cambridge, england, in september 2007. endnotes are therefore included.]

gravity is the most familiar force. we are subject to it every day of our lives. newton gave us his ‘law of gravity,’ which describes its effect but doesn’t explain it. “i frame no hypotheses,” he wrote. einstein wasn’t so prudent when he introduced his “postulates.” unfortunately, his unreal geometry doesn’t explain gravity either. the usual demonstration using heavy steel balls on a rubber sheet to represent ‘gravity wells’ relies on gravity as its own explanation!

sundari
08-28-2008, 03:34 PM
cows seem to know which way is north...

url: http://www.physorg.com/news138902073.html

Berry Chastain
09-02-2008, 11:26 AM
i am not surprised with this observation. i have two dogs and two cats at home. i have physically taken a compass and noted that when any one of them is resting or sleeping they will be aligned within 5 degrees of magnetic north. as a matter of fact i had noticed this before and measured it just a week or so ago, realizing what was happening.

it seems to me that all animals which migrate annually must also have this sense. birds, butterflies, whales, and caribou... they all have an innate knowing of their relationship to the world around them.

LightEye
09-03-2008, 12:18 PM
dear friends,

interesting info from maurice cotterell.

http://www.mauricecotterell.com/gravity1.html

be well, be love.

david

RedPlanetRevolver
11-01-2008, 11:23 PM
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30oct_ftes.htm

theirs the link to the story i don't want to emphasize to much on the story itself just on something david talked about relating to this. in the article they state that every 8 minutes a magnetic portal opens and connects the sun and the earth for a brief time transporting electrons and other such particles in a fast rate. david talks about how all over the planet at random moments when there are proper alignments stargates
or portals form for brief amounts of time. i've watched all davids videos multiple times and notice on project looking glass the size of the coils surrounding the center piece are huge which means they needed a lot of power. i also watch stargate and notice that when they fire it up the rings start to spin much like the rings in the looking glass just in a different fashion. david states that stargates are an old form of transportation and very dangerous, i can see that being true when comparing it to a extraterrestrial space craft, i can see a big danger of stargates being that if you are in one traveling in one from one destination to another and the gate loses power what happens if you are not through, i'm sure the outcome is not a good one. i have a strong theory that these portals are a result of strong electromagnetic fields purging through time/space space/time. i believe they do this by rotating the rings in opposite directions (ring on front of stargate spin clockwise, ring on back spins counterclockwise) and they apply a positive charge to one ring and a negative to another creating a electromagnetic twister that rips through the fabric of time. selecting a destination is just a matter of adjusting the underlying/secondary power to the perfect degree, before they start the stargate they must enter the correct symbols to dial earth or whatever planet they wish and i believe this is they setting of the secondary voltages to the perfect degree.

that`s my theory and i hope you find it interesting, comment on it and share your own thoughts on this as well i would really appreciate it.

LightEye
11-11-2008, 05:22 AM
dear friends,

http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081110/full/news.2008.1217.html?s=news_rss

be well, be love.

david

time to test time
the essential fuzziness of time may be the limiting factor for a gravitational-wave detector in germany.
eric hand

poets have long believed the passage of time to be unavoidable, inexorable and generally melancholic. quantum mechanics says it is fuzzy, ticking along at minimum intervals within which the notion of time is meaningless. and craig hogan claims he can 'see' it — in the thus far unexplained noise of a gravitational-wave detector. "it's potentially the most transformative thing i've ever worked on," says hogan, director of the center for particle astrophysics at the fermi national accelerator laboratory in batavia, illinois. "it's actually a possibility that we can access experimentally the minimum interval of time, which we thought was out of reach."

litllady
11-19-2008, 08:45 AM
new curiousity of mine...

being one that doesnt think anything is coincidence, im going to propose a thought i hope some will respond back on. my curiosities revolve around eye floaters and the illusion of them not being a coincidence.

some of us here have these eye floaters, right...the little tissue in the eye that brakes off and we see it floating in our sight (but usually not sitting still, it floats one way or the other usually). could these floaters be detectors of when a person is in a neutral zone of the magnetic streams of waves that cycle through the earth?

i remember observing the moon in the summer time this yr. and noticed that when the moon was straight above me, my floaters floated in a stand still center position without floating off out of my sight. thinking back on this, and also watching dust float in my living room while the sun burst through the window...i get the same kind connected feeling as i got when observing the moon that night. there are streams of waves that seem to follow some order of magnetic or electric forces or web of energy. i remember edward leedskalnin supposedly saw pearl or beads in the sky when he looked. was he seeing a stillness, a neutral zone? did he have these eye floaters??

could these eye floaters be a way to observe the earths energy nodes, like dust floating along the waves of the earths energy? usually dust floats/moves along a 90 degree angle (from what ive read so far) but yet, for whatever reasons, it doesnt always follow this angle. the energy lines change, the path of the dust particles can change...i wonder if these tissues in our eye that brakes off follow this same pattern of floating along a magnetic force or line, kinda the same way the compass needle gravitates to the magnetic north.

peace to all,
lynette

Allan
12-14-2008, 03:45 PM
hi i am new to this forum.

thirty two years ago in 1977 i had a dream where i appeared next to a generator, the dream repeated and i tried to look inside the device, some one took me by the shoulder and the dream ended. the next day while working the dream came to mind and then unexpectedly i was energized over approximately 5 seconds and i knew there is a god and exactly where god is. it was as though another mind was placed in my mind as a comparison and was the mind of an immortal.

knowledge of mind, human consciousness, planetary energy, and technology, answers to every thing. for three years i was given answers to all manner of questions and i was taught by god. do i believe it?

yes, over the years i have investigated and learnt, met with people but overall everyone has a story to tell and i have been content to listen. bruce cathie lived not far from me and i did talk to him. i had some time with vera comer who was convinced she was watched by the s.i.s. she was a part of john searles inverse gravity and designed craft group. i met him in 1995?

my back ground is mechanical engineering and i had moved on to some land with my wife and lived off savings. i had this experience at the best time of my life. i have had on going experiences. the story i have should be told even if i am ridiculed for it.

there must be beings who have all technology sorted out because all these ideas were shown to me from another mind, they must know everything about human consciousness as well.

all this was new to me these ideas were of things that were never contemplated. i was very unsettled and some of the first experiments i did was to understand the field around a wire carrying a current and how to get this current to flow cheaply and how it was part of the bonding of the atoms together and how to distort it. i looked at the planet forces and calculated that in energy terms the earth is like the hub of a large wheel that prescribes an arc as it rolls around the sun on an invisible circumference creating invisible eddies that are expanded on the light side.

voltage occurs and increases to millions with altitude. all matter is manifested, made to appear and at the point of manifestation the mass is displaced within the energy field and is positioned or driven through space.

the planet is being created in a new position continuously. the propolosion system of a craft. the earth becomes a resonating chamber at a certain level of intensity and a field of energy swirls about the planet and the angle of the pyramid is precise to cut the field and displace it. a small effect is required and the measurements of it are usually discounted. the energy of the pyramid exists, a pendulim can be used to indicate the strongest energy and place it in the correct position.

gravitational effect would have to be greater at the equator than the poles to counter the outward force produced by revolving speed on the surface. the geometry of the energy about the rolling planet is a clue.

life forms are predisposed to die and the energy of the planet is to reduce everthing back to base elements by water and oxygen. humans have a combined conciousness that reflects the planet biology and have a mind that is altogether predatory and self protective and leads to conflict driving out the possibility of immortality with a higher more refined ability to connect and bond with pure intentions.

humans are de-energized by the subconscious mental processes needed to cope with interacting with others including family members every one holds each other down. all have own self belief and use willpower to protect it.

god is an energizing spirit but the pure energy is used to empower the will though a mind full of all those attribrutes everyone would be aware of and takes on the corrupting influences of the earth (oxidizing at the cellular) then becoming prediposed to death. mankinds energy problems are because of a delusion that overtakes it.

science, technology, they are looking for hard answers because there is money in it and easy answers would make them look like fools. we read in history of different civilisations how they rise and fall. the consciousness and nature of man needs to be diconnected from a biological and de-energized state, people will become worse and better but will not with-stand the change if time differences and manifestion occur in a device.

in energy terms force is required for acceleration and is recovered at deceleration, very little to move at a constant speed. all mechanical generators are designed to accelerate and decelerate currents that produce strong changing magnetic fields within each cycle. these fields oppose rotation and require force to be overcome. any ineffeciency is magnified. a steady current could flow between two energy states that were made from a gravitational difference. --gravitation occurs with the manifestation of matter--. a bit like running a wire from one planet to another. how much energy would be required to have a different gravity, how much current would flow and where would the electrons go to? is gravity like a coercive state and is that all that is required to generate? a small force required to keep everything going.

in a transformer the currents can flow with much less magnetism in the device therefore less force is required. when a rotor spins in an atmosphere there is drag, it is better to use a solid state. we have a power system that is designed to be metered. nikola tesla was shut down by his backers or perhaps not?
this is getting too long i will finish. --allan--

LightEye
02-01-2009, 12:15 PM
dear friends,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dycelonwdb4

also this;

mit researcher responds to "anti"-gravity tech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiklmv5fdni&feature=channel_page

be well, be love.

david

day 93 (of 100 days of antigravity disclosure): i went to cambridge, ma to hand out flyers and discuss anti-gravity technology with students and professors from the massachusetts institute of techn...
day 93 (of 100 days of antigravity disclosure): i went to cambridge, ma to hand out flyers and discuss anti-gravity technology with students and professors from the massachusetts institute of technology.

a copy of the anti-gravity flyer can be found here:
[link removed]

i also thought i would put some of my jam sessions on this video as background music. here are two multi track recordings where i play both guitars with my friend on drums.

the response was overwhelmingly positive with only a group of 3 mit frat boys who told me they didn't think obama should declassify anti-gravity. (however they didn't actually bother to take the time to look at it and review my national security risk assessment)

this is only the beginning...

here is a memo you should fax to:
national security advisor james l. jones
national intelligence advisor dennis blair
here's that memo:

subj: national security risk assessment for disclosure of ufo / antigravity files.

what we know: unidentified flying objects have been witnessed and photographed. flying saucers or disc shaped craft, as well as a flying triangle shaped craft have been spotted, yet neither has been confirmed as belonging to the us military.

1. nasa was ordered to hand over documents in response to a march 27, 2007 federal court ruling by judge emmet g. sullivan (case#1:03cv02509) regarding the freedom of information act lawsuit filed by leslie kean. nasa is withholding secret documents and materials that were seized from a crash site in kecksburg, pa on december 9, 1965.
[link removed]

2. former area 51 employee and whistle blower edgar fouche says he worked on the aurora project for the us military where he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the tr3-b flying triangle which uses rotating mercury based plasma to achieve anti-gravity. the fundamental scientific principals behind this technology (anomalous effects of rotating bose-einstein condensates) have been investigated by boeings [grasp], nasas advance concepts office, & nasas gravity probe b.

what we don't know: the origins of this technology, and why the government is being so secretive about it? many have suspicions that these craft are extraterrestrial in origin or that the technology was back-engineered from crashed alien space craft. conspiracy theories abound as the american people receive lies and cover-ups from their government instead of answers.

national security risk assessment: there are several risk factors associated with disclosing the truth about extraterrestrial life, however there are no risks associated with disclosing anti-gravity technology. the notion that our enemies could use this technology against us is completely nullified by the technical feasibility of such a project. russia, iran and china are perhaps the only countries with the economic infrastructure capable of even producing such technology. an assembly line capable of manufacturing fleets of these aircraft would require an impossible feat of engineering. the only realistic applications for this technology are in space exploration through nasa

thank you for your time and dedicated service to the american people. our thoughts and prayers are with you during this remarkable era of human history.

LightEye
03-17-2009, 04:06 AM
dear friends,

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126990.400-gravity-may-venture-where-matter-fears-to-tread.html?full=true

be well, be love.

david

gravity may venture where matter fears to tread
16 march 2009 by marcus chown

there is nothing certain in this world, us founding father benjamin franklin once wrote, except death and taxes. as a scientist, he might have added a third inescapable force: gravity, the unseen hand that keeps our feet on the ground.

gravity is the universal force. not only does it stop us getting above ourselves, it keeps earth orbiting around the sun, our sun swinging around the centre of the milky way, the milky way in a merry dance around its neighbours, and so on upwards. it is actually the weakest of nature's four forces, but whereas the other three - electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces - unleash their full strength only at the scales of atoms and particles, gravity conserves its power to trump all comers in the cosmos at large. just take any two things that have mass, and whatever their size, wherever they are, they will feel gravity's grasp in exactly the same way.

or will they? justin khoury, now of the university of pennsylvania in philadelphia, and his colleagues niayesh afshordi and ghazal geshnizjani of the perimeter institute for theoretical physics in waterloo, ontario, are not so sure. they have listed a series of cosmological observations that cannot readily be explained with a one-size-fits-all gravity (www.arxiv.org/abs/0812.2244). none of these effects on its own, they stress, necessarily indicates anything amiss. but intriguingly, all of them melt away if you make just one assumption, albeit a controversial one: that how gravity works depends on the scale on which you look at it.

Ali Quadir
03-17-2009, 06:13 AM
another super interesting article...

would it be an idea to combine these articles and links into some kind of research wiki? where statements are ordered in categories and online articles or references to the scientific community to support these statements are placed below the statements.

i've been thinking about setting something like this up for myself. the amount of articles in my bookmarks list is getting ridiculously large and it's poorly categorized right now. i mostly do everything by memory... and my memory sucks :)

LightEye
03-18-2009, 04:32 AM
dear friends,

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/08/22/0803650105.full.pdf+html

be well, be love.

david

magnetic alignment in grazing and resting cattle and deer

sabine begall*,†, jaroslav Červený‡,§, julia neef*, oldřich vojtčch‡,¶, and hynek burda* +author

*department of general zoology, faculty of biology and geography, university of duisburg-essen, 45141 essen, germany; §institute of vertebrate biology, academy of sciences of the czech republic, 60365 brno, czech republic; ‡department of forest protection and wildlife management, faculty of forestry and wood sciences, czech university of life sciences, 16521 praha 6, czech republic; and sumava national park administration, susicka 399, 341 92 kasperske hory, czech republic edited by simon a. levin, princeton university, princeton, nj, and approved july 17, 2008 (received for review april 15, 2008)

abstract

we demonstrate by means of simple, noninvasive methods (analysis of satellite images, field observations, and measuring “deer beds” in snow) that domestic cattle (n = 8,510 in 308 pastures) across the globe, and grazing and resting red and roe deer (n = 2,974 at 241 localities), align their body axes in roughly a north–south direction. direct observations of roe deer revealed that animals orient their heads northward when grazing or resting. amazingly, this ubiquitous phenomenon does not seem to have been noticed by herdsmen, ranchers, or hunters. because wind and light conditions could be excluded as a common denominator determining the body axis orientation, magnetic alignment is the most parsimonious explanation. to test the hypothesis that cattle orient their body axes along the field lines of the earth's magnetic field, we analyzed the body orientation of cattle from localities with high magnetic declination. here, magnetic north was a better predictor than geographic north. this study reveals the magnetic alignment in large mammals based on statistically sufficient sample sizes. our findings open horizons for the study of magnetoreception in general and are of potential significance for applied ethology (husbandry, animal welfare). they challenge neuroscientists and biophysics to explain the proximate mechanisms.

starborne
03-18-2009, 11:52 PM
wow, i was wondering when someone would find such evidence of living beings acting upon magnetoreception. i believe i also read somewhere once that human eyes do respond to magnetic fields, and the signal is sent to the brain, but we are not conscieous of the information. i wish i knew where i saw that as it was at least 6-7 years ago.

LightEye
04-02-2009, 01:55 AM
dear friends,

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16871-sweet-dreams-are-made-of-geomagnetic-activity.html

be well, be love.

david

sweet dreams are made of geomagnetic activity
00:01 01 april 2009 by ewen callaway

looking for an explanation for recurring nightmares of leaving the house without your trousers on or losing your teeth? new research suggests you can blame the earth's magnetic field, rather than a repressed childhood.

darren lipnicki, a psychologist formerly at the center for space medicine in berlin, germany, found a correlation between the bizarreness of his dreams, recorded over eight years, and extremes in local geomagnetic activity.

other studies have tied low geomagnetic activity to increases in the production of the melatonin, a potent hormone that helps set the body's circadian clock. so, based on anecdotal evidence that melatonin supplements used as a sleeping aid can cause off-kilter dreams, lipnicki wondered whether local magnetic fields could induce the same effects.

Eddie
04-27-2009, 05:28 PM
at this link, you'll find an interesting story about a fellow who has replicated a motor based upon magnets (originally invented about 30 years ago), that requires no outside power source. a couple of his videos are embedded in the web page. as one might predict, there are people who are attempting to bully him into keeping his invention secret.

salt lake city motor saga (http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-8199-salt-lake-city-breakthrough-energy-examiner~y2009m4d22-mylow-magnet-motor-saga)

this technology needs to be made public, not hidden from us.

weboy78
04-28-2009, 02:54 PM
thomas valone gave a lecture on advanced energy and propulsion technologies in 2008 at the annual exopolitical event: the x-conference.


http://vimeo.com/3920899

http://vimeo.com/3935734

weboy78
05-02-2009, 03:10 PM
cosmic energy from italian researcher

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqjz_swftia&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsibex1okd4&feature=channel_page

note: normally this post would not be allowed since it is in italian (duh) but it is
interesting viewing and possible very important...so am giving it a pass. this once.
but wiser heads may prevail, so watch it quick.

billybobbutterball esq. jr. moderator

LightEye
05-04-2009, 12:09 PM
dear friends,

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/16291/

be well, be love.

david

time for a new theory of gravitation? galaxies challenge newtonian model
dr. robert massey
royal astronomical society may 4, 2009

the high speed of stars and apparent presence of ‘dark matter’ in the satellite galaxies that orbit our milky way galaxy presents a direct challenge to newton’s theory of gravitation, according to physicists from germany, austria and australia. professor pavel kroupa of the university of bonn’s argelander-institut fuer astronomie (alfa) will discuss the results of the team’s two studies in a presentation on wednesday 22nd april at the european week of astronomy and space science conference at the university of hertfordshire.

together with scientists at the university of vienna and the australian national university in canberra, the alfa team looked at the small dwarf galaxies that orbit the milky way. some of these contain only a few thousand stars and so are relatively faint and difficult to find. standard cosmological models predict the presence of hundreds of these companions around most of the larger galaxies, but up to now only 30 have been observed around the milky way.

LightEye
05-06-2009, 12:36 PM
dear friends,

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227071.100-hunting-the-mysterious-monopole.html?full=true

be well, be love.

david

hunting the mysterious monopole

* 06 may 2009 by eugenie samuel reich
* magazine issue 2707. subscribe and get 4 free issues.

they seem magical: magnets, every child's favourite science toy. two otherwise ordinary lumps of metal draw inexorably closer, finally locking together with a satisfying snap. yet turn one of them round and they show an entirely different, repulsive face: try as you might to make them, never the twain shall meet.

if magnets seem rather bipolar, that's because they are. every magnet has two poles, a north and a south. like poles repel, unlike poles attract. no magnet breaks the two-pole rule - not the humblest bar magnet, not the huge dynamo at the heart of our planet. split a magnet in two, and each half sprouts the pole it lost. it seems that poles without their twins - magnetic "monopoles" - simply do not exist.

that hasn't stopped physicists hunting. for decades they have ransacked everything from moon rock and cosmic rays to ocean-floor sludge to find them. there is a simple reason for this quixotic quest. our best explanations of how the universe hangs together demand that magnetic monopoles exist. if they are not plain to see, they must be hiding.

weboy78
05-14-2009, 03:54 AM
my friends, the truth is near, all diffrent researcher like haramein, wilcock and other from italy are in the same truth

http://www.giulianaconforto.it/english/home.eng.htm

weboy78
05-15-2009, 08:27 AM
cosmic energy from italian researcher

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqjz_swftia&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsibex1okd4&feature=channel_page

note: normally this post would not be allowed since it is in italian (duh) but it is
interesting viewing and possible very important...so am giving it a pass. this once.
but wiser heads may prevail, so watch it quick.

billybobbutterball esq. jr. moderator

i've contacted haramein website, they are very interested on ighina's study ;)

Tsandi MAndi
05-20-2009, 05:05 PM
cosmic energy from italian researcher

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqjz_swftia&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsibex1okd4&feature=channel_page

note: normally this post would not be allowed since it is in italian (duh) but it is
interesting viewing and possible very important...so am giving it a pass. this once.
but wiser heads may prevail, so watch it quick.

billybobbutterball esq. jr. moderator

absolutely marvelous............

Xander
09-10-2009, 07:31 AM
howdy from texas,

http://www.livescience.com/animals/090909-mouse-levitation.html

-alec

mice levitated in lab

by charles q. choi, special to livescience
posted: 09 september 2009 10:01 am et

"scientists have now levitated mice using magnetic fields. other researchers have made live frogs and grasshoppers float in mid-air before, but such research with mice, being closer biologically to humans, could help in studies to counteract bone loss due to reduced gravity over long spans of time, as might be expected in deep space missions or on the surfaces of other planets."

i found this article to be very interesting, as it is the first time i've seen any "mainstream" coverage about levitation(anti-gravity?).

Jasper
09-12-2009, 01:57 AM
spacecraft 'could surf gravitational tubes' to make solar travel more efficient


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/6171848/spacecraft-could-surf-gravitational-tubes-to-make-solar-travel-more-efficient.html

surfs up dudes! get yer hover-boards ready, moon boots on, and hit that martian beach.

MarkM
10-11-2009, 04:19 PM
interesting link regarding the nature of galactic center... mark

http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/solar08/062308_milky_way_birkeland_current.htm

anatomy of the milky way core
at present, we find ourselves in the unsatisfying position of having remarkable new observational insight into the nature of the galactic center but lacking a sturdy interpretive framework. - robert l. brown and harvey s. listz "sagittarius a and it's environment" annual review of astronomy and astrophysics

written in 1984 it appears that since then things have only worsened.

according to some estimates the bright radio source known as sagittarius a* (pronounced a-star), residing at the heart of our milky way galaxy, is more than 50 light-years wide. it's radio glow stems from synchrotron radiation, the result of charged particles spiraling around magnetic field lines at relativistic speeds. assumptions have been made that the sag a* complex is the result of a massive black hole. yet, save for mathematical computer models based on gravitational conjecture, not a single black hole has ever been found. might the well known plasma dynamics of an electric universe reveal the true nature of the milky way's galactic center?

LightEye
10-15-2009, 12:27 PM
dear friends,

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/10/15/scientists-create-magnetricity%e2%80%94magnetic-charge-that-flows-like-electricity/

be well, be love.

david

scientists create “magnetricity”—magnetic charge that flows like electricity

magnets may have seemed simple when you learned about them in elementary school, but physicists are coaxing some very odd behaviors out of magnetic materials these days. in the latest new development, scientists created the magnetic equivalent of electricity and named the phenomenon “magnetricity.” in the same way that electrically charged particles flow to create an electric current, individual north and south magnetic poles have been observed flowing along to generate a magnetic current.

the basis of the experiment was a refutation of a rule of magnetism observed in our day-to-day lives: no matter how many times you divide a magnet, the resulting fragments will always have both north and south poles. but more than 70 years ago, physicist paul dirac theorized that elementary particles should exist that have only a north or south pole, and dubbed these theoretical particles magnetic monopoles. last month, researchers got closer to spotting a monopole than ever before, when they created ripples that had the same magnetic properties as monopoles.

Zeke
10-15-2009, 02:33 PM
this is a really interesting concept, especally if you follow nassim haramein's work(which is posted in the new science [and general discussions] forums). it would appear that this technology could have an application of taking in light and using it to produce electricity! here is an excerpt

the device, which works at microwave frequencies, may soon be extended to trap visible light, leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity.


a theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by evgenii narimanov and alexander kildishev of purdue university in west lafayette, indiana. their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.

now tie jun cui and qiang cheng at the southeast university in nanjing, china, have turned narimanov and kildishev's theory into practice, and built a "black hole" for microwave frequencies. it is made of 60 annular strips of so-called "meta-materials", which have previously been used to make invisibility cloaks.

source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17980-first-black-hole-for-light-created-on-earth.html

weboy78
10-17-2009, 10:29 AM
researchers from various countries suggested numerous hypotheses about nature of the ball lightning; however, not a single hypothesis is widely recognized. the most substantiated hypothesis comes from the russian scientist i. stakhanov, who thinks that ball lightning consists of unusual plasma or positive and negative ions, covered with water molecules, which make lightning more stable.
http://www.russia-ic.com/education_science/science/breakthrough/921/

ascendingstarseed
10-30-2009, 12:26 AM
now we don't get this kind of news in america anymore, all this information gets suppressed and replaced with news about brittany spears underwear and fake death panels. remember the airliners that went down last year, one of them a france airliner went down inexplicably in the atlantic ocean killing several hundred people? this was reported in june, why didn't we hear of this?

here's an excerpt from the following newspaper report out of macedonia paper about russia warning their air force pilots to stay away from certain areas, also has some pretty serious implications in regards to upcoming earth changes. seems like a little censoring of the news may be going on as well:

"the reason for this unprecedented warning, these reports state, are the rapid formations of “geomagnetic storms” emanating from the boundaries of the african tectonic plate that due to their intensity have caused the loss of two major passenger aircraft during the past month leaving nearly 300 men, women and children dead."
http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/7331/53

here's the first paragraph of the article, it's a four page "must read" that cuts off when it really starts to get interesting and talks about cayce's predictions of rising land masses, so you'll have to go the above link to finish the fascinating and eye-opening read....

russians order flight changes, after massive magnetic shift downs airliners... print
tuesday, 30 june 2009
reports circulating in the kremlin today are saying that russian air force commanders have issued warnings to all of their aircraft to exercise “extreme caution” during flights “in and around” an area defined as latitude 17 north [north atlantic ocean] latitude 3 south [south atlantic ocean] to latitude 8 north [indian ocean] latitude 19 south [indian ocean] between the longitudes of 46 west, 33 west, 46 east and 33 east, and which covers the greater part of the african tectonic plate.

[moderators love this link. the article does state that there may be a nibiru-type body in the outer reaches of our solar boundaries, and this we do not believe, especially with the discovery in the outer heliosphere of a huge cosmic energy thread recently discovered. this is discussed in the sun thread, post # 127. this gives even more credence to david's theories]

Happystrings
12-18-2009, 09:29 AM
now the defense department is researching lightning ..note that it's to try to prevent damage from lightning...ya' sure :eek::

http://www.sphere.com/nation/article/pentagon-launches-nimbus-plan-to-master-lightning/19285181

LightEye
01-20-2010, 04:07 AM
dear friends,

http://www.glcoherence.org/templates/gcp/e-mail/e-broadcast/commentaries/2010/online/gcms-commentaries-2010-01-13-online.html?mtccampaign=9664&mtcemail=22846660

be well, be love.

david

the impact of magnetic pulsations on humans and animals

dear gci member,

with the start of the new year, the gci team is excited to announce that we now have over 20,000 members! we are grateful for our growing community and your contributions and care towards raising global consciousness at such an important time of the planetary shift. the future of our planet depends on all of us because we are co-creating the world we live in.

the magnetic sense of animals

as many of you may be aware, a large variety of animals possess a "magnetic sense."

the earth is surrounded by a magnetic field which is generated by the flow of molten material in the earth’s core and the flow of ions in the atmosphere. amazingly, a number of animals are able to sense this magnetic field. just as a compass helps us navigate by detecting magnetic north, animals that possess a magnetic sense are able to identify direction and navigate over long distances. it is not fully understood how these animals actually sense the earth’s magnetic field. however, researchers have found that each of these animals have deposits of biological magnetite in their nervous systems. magnetite is a small magnetic mineral. the presence of magnetite is not a definite evidence for the perception of the earth’s magnetic field. however, these magnet-like minerals align themselves with the magnetic fields of the earth and might act like microscopic compass needles.

Elluindil
01-23-2010, 01:15 AM
however, if this is due to spacetime torsion, well, that's like saying it's due to a spinning gas cloud 50 light years wide.

spin a whisk in a bowl of cake batter: torsion.
spin a gas cloud 50 ly wide: also torsion.

http://www.atomicprecision.com/uft/uft.html

http://www.atomicprecision.com/uft/uft.html the first paragraph gives a bit of the flavor of an otherwise mathy article.

it is important to be aware that most astro-physics guys do not consider torsion in spacetime. they only know about curvature (ie gravity).

LightEye
01-25-2010, 12:13 PM
dear friends,

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/fusion-ldx-0125.html

be well, be love.

david


levitating magnet brings space physics to fusion

tests on an experimental machine that mimics a planet’s magnetic field show that it may offer an ‘alternative path’ to taming nuclear fusion for power generation.
david l. chandler, mit news office

a new experiment that reproduces the magnetic fields of the earth and other planets has yielded its first significant results. the findings confirm that its unique approach has some potential to be developed as a new way of creating a power-producing plant based on nuclear fusion — the process that generates the sun’s prodigious output of energy.

fusion has been a cherished goal of physicists and energy researchers for more than 50 years. that’s because it offers the possibility of nearly endless supplies of energy with no carbon emissions and far less radioactive waste than that produced by today’s nuclear plants, which are based on fission, the splitting of atoms (the opposite of fusion, which involves fusing two atoms together). but developing a fusion reactor that produces a net output of energy has proved to be more challenging than initially thought.

the new results come from an experimental fusion reactor at the plasma science and fusion center on the mit campus, inspired by observations from space made by satellites. called the levitated dipole experiment, or ldx, a joint project of mit and columbia university, it uses a half-ton donut-shaped magnet about the size and shape of a large truck tire, made of superconducting wire coiled inside a stainless steel vessel. this magnet is suspended by a powerful electromagnetic field, and is used to control the motion of the 10-million-degree-hot electrically charged gas, or plasma, contained within its 16-foot-diameter outer chamber.

weboy78
01-25-2010, 02:29 PM
controlling gravity using quantum mechanics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4i5mgbkpzy

LightEye
03-30-2010, 10:59 AM
dear friends,

http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5445

be well, be love.

david

gravity from quantum information
authors: jae-weon lee, hyeong-chan kim, jungjai lee
(submitted on 29 jan 2010 (v1), last revised 21 mar 2010 (this version, v2))

abstract: it is suggested that classical einstein gravity can be derived by using the landauer's principle applied to an information erasure at causal horizons and jacobson's idea linking the einstein equation to thermodynamics. our result implies that gravity has a quantum informational origin.

weboy78
04-14-2010, 12:38 AM
the european space agency announces gravity modification breakthrough

kirkland, wa: mar. 29: the european space agency announced on march 21st the results of an experimental test in which a superconductor rotating at 6,500 rpm is shown to gain acceleration as the result of what is believed to be a gravity-modification effect. as reported by the esa, "the experiment demonstrated that a superconductive gyroscope is capable of generating a powerful gravitomagnetic field, and is therefore the gravitational counterpart of the magnetic coil. although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than einstein’s general relativity predicts."

the results were presented march 21st at the esa's european space and technology research centre (estec), in a paper entitled "experimental detection of the gravitomagnetic london moment". the paper predicts the presence of a large gravitomagnetic field within a rotating superconductor, and describes the experimental detection of this phenomenon as an extra-gravitational acceleration on the superconductor on the order of 100 µg.
http://www.superconductorweek.com/pr/0306aax/eas1.htm

LightEye
04-14-2010, 12:50 PM
dear friends,

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/33307/

be well, be love.

david

gravity affects time flow
andres cordova
epoch times staff

three physicists from the united states and germany have confirmed that a phenomenon known as gravitational redshift, which causes time to slow down near a huge mass, is true to a precision of seven parts in a billion (7 × 10^–9).

the confirmation of the gravitational redshift effect verifies that the flow of time is not constant throughout our universe. instead, it varies according to the relative position to massive bodies and the gravitational pull that these enormous masses can exert.

to illustrate in simple terms, if a clock is close to a massive body, or if it is being pulled by a huge gravitational force, the closer it is to this huge celestial body or the stronger the gravitational pull, the slower the clock will tick.

jamesactor2010
04-19-2010, 11:14 AM
hello. i would like to mention a friend of mine who is on the forefront of research into this area. his work involves sacred geometry, gravity and the periodic table of elements. unfortunately he does not have a website as yet. perhaps i will encourage him to create one. he really is a brilliant man. his name is james sawyer and he's lectured in europe. he has a business called six dimension design in buffalo, ny he does stained glass. he is working on a book now. i'll let you know if i come up with anything else. maybe i can encourage him to join this group and start posting. peace

weboy78
05-27-2010, 09:44 AM
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627596.600-quantum-wonders-the-field-that-isnt-there.html
here's a nice piece of quantum nonsense. take a doughnut-shaped magnet and wrap a metal shield round its inside edge so that no magnetic field can leak into the hole. then fire an electron through the hole.

there is no field in the hole, so the electron will act as if there is no field, right? wrong. the wave associated with the electron's movement suffers a jolt as if there were something there.

LightEye
09-10-2010, 12:03 PM
dear friends,

http://www.physorg.com/news203241923.html

be well, be love.

david

origin of magnetic fields may lie in special relativity's spacetime distortions
september 9, 2010 by lisa zyga enlarge

(physorg.com) -- magnetic fields play an important role on scales ranging from the sub-atomic to the cosmic, from particle spins to galaxy clusters. although scientists know how to create and manipulate magnetic fields, as well as use them for a variety of applications from computers to credit cards, they still don't have a universal theory of how magnetic fields initially originated in astrophysical settings. in a new study, two scientists have proposed a new primary generation mechanism for the magnetic field that is based on the spacetime distortions caused by special relativity.

magnetic fields are invisible fields that exert a vector force, characterized by both strength and direction, and are produced by magnetic objects or changing electric fields. when described by ideal dynamics, magnetic fields are mathematically and physically equivalent to a vorticity, meaning they have a tendency to rotate. this is what makes it difficult to determine the origin of magnetic fields, since it means that magnetic fields have helicity, which is a kind of “topological charge.” however, helicity cannot change under the influence of an ideal force, forbidding the emergence of any vorticity from an initial zero value.

to get around this constraint, scientists have more recently turned to non-ideal dynamics. researchers have looked at non-ideal mechanisms ranging from something called the baroclinic effect to processes stemming from inflation, quantum chromodynamics phase transitions, and radiation effects. however, while these mechanisms likely play a role in magnetic-field generation at some scales, none of these effects can be considered a universal mechanism that operates at all scales.

in their new study, swadesh mahajan from the university of texas at austin and zensho yoshida from the university of tokyo have proposed something entirely different. since all non-ideal mechanisms are too weak and not general enough to explain the origin of magnetic fields, they decided to reexamine the ideal dynamics. they found that vorticity/magnetic fields can be generated in strictly ideal dynamics, as long as the dynamics is embedded in the twisted spacetime described by special relativity. their mechanism can seed a magnetic field, which can then be amplified by the dynamo mechanism to create larger magnetic fields.

Felicatra
06-24-2011, 10:23 PM
"it's like space lightning.

according to popsci, scientists at the university of toronto have discovered the strongest current to date in space about 2 billion light years from earth. the insane current was found near galaxy 3c303, the core of which is a "huge cosmic jet."

with a voltage of 10^18 amps the current is equal to about 1 trillion lightning bolts.

the explanation for the massive current however is little more than a theory."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/22/highest-electrical-current-universe-space-lightning_n_882534.html

Apophis
09-29-2011, 11:59 AM
the science of focusing gravity.

sfi has got me deeply intertwined into geometrical connections to the source field. namely the science behind gravity focusing. this can be as simple as a 5 sided pyramid.

Sammy
10-20-2011, 07:07 AM
this i think is amazing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emj8-56l3lc

this argon gas seems to be a welcomed comfort for the electricity. you can even see in the beggining of the clip and in moments throughout that the currents dont want to go anywhere but down. its mind boggling to me how the gas removes the elecricities want for a ground.

Sammy
10-24-2011, 09:17 AM
ok i wasnt too sure where else to put this, but it includes most or all of these topics.

overview:

mass x acceleration = force

velocity x force = momentum

i was simply trying to figure out what earths movement is classified as, being force, velocity, momentum, etc.... so i started writing it out.

the sun being the force of the solar system, this was mass x acceleration creating the distance of its mass. uninterupted this would go at a velocity (constant rate), but this velocity doesnt keep going its stopped us to make planets. the only way this can happen is another force to impose on that velocity. i think this is the interaction of anti-matter, were not surrounded by it, but it blended with the suns force creating a constant momentum instead of velocity. the suns mass is spreading out, so the anti-mass has no choice but to move in (displacement).

this momentum created i think we call gravity. the force and velocity at a constant rate of interaction, to support it. out of the atmosphere is 0 gravity. within the atmosphere is mass but the least dense "gases". then the dense mass "water/dirt". then going so forcefull at the center, mass cant escape and it creates the friction needed for our core.

the gasses and surface would be the only points of interaction with the anti-matter and matter. it might just be me but i find that way to coincidental. were not more one then the other, and we deffinitely use both (air, and ground). there is no way anti-matter accidentily or by chance created a oppisate force this gentle and precise.

also i was thinking about this matter and anti-matter interaction. matter is like a bridge and anti would be like a gap or chasm. i believe both have been pinpoints in many beliefs throughout time.

Jeia Ra Manuk
10-24-2011, 11:50 AM
"through my research of gamma rays" maybe this will help a little,
i recommend for all to study gamma rays, if you don't know what they are and how they are produced.

now i get it,
particles and antiparticles are mixing in the center of the galaxy thus producing gamma rays!
from what i have learned before, matter does not carry charge because there is an equal amount of electrons(-) and protons(+) in the atoms. antimatter consists of positrons(+) and antiprotons(-).

"the problem: there is considerable speculation as to why the observable universe is apparently almost entirely matter, whether there exist other places that are almost entirely antimatter instead, and what might be possible if antimatter could be harnessed. at this time, the apparent asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the greatest unsolved problems in physics.
the baryon asymmetry problem in physics refers to the apparent fact that there is an imbalance in baryonic matter and antibaryonic matterin the universe. neither the standard model of particle physics, nor the theory of general relativity provide an obvious explanation for why this should be so; and it is a natural assumption that the universe be neutral with all conserved charges.[1] the big bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter, as such, there should have been total cancellation of both. in other words, protons should have cancelled with antiprotons, electrons with antielectrons (positrons), neutrons with antineutrons, and so on for all elementary particles. this would have resulted in a sea of photons in the universe with no matter. since this is evidently not the case, after the big bang, some physical laws must have acted differently for matter and antimatter."

"solutions:
regions of the universe where antimatter predominates
another possible explanation of the apparent baryon asymmetry is that there are regions of the universe in which matter is dominant, and other regions of the universe in which antimatter is dominant, and these are widely separated. the problem therefore becomes a matter/antimatter separation problem, rather than a creation imbalance problem. antimatter atoms would appear from a distance indistinguishable from matter atoms, as both matter and antimatter atoms would produce light (photons) in the same way. only in the border between a matter dominated region and an antimatter dominated region would the antimatter's presence be detectable, as only there would matter/antimatter annihilation (and the subsequent production of gamma radiation) occur. how easily such a boundary would be to detect would depend on its distance and what the density of matter and antimatter is along it. presumably such a boundary would lie (almost by necessity) in deep intergalactic space, and the density of matter in intergalactic space is reasonably well established at about one atom per cubic metre.[3][4] assuming this is the typical density of both matter and antimatter near a boundary, the gamma ray luminosity of the boundary interaction zone is easily calculated. approximately 30 years of scientific research have placed boundaries on how far away, at a minimum, any such boundary interaction zone would have to be, as no such zones have been detected. hence, it is now considered unlikely that any region within the observable universe is antimatter dominated.
at least one more major scientific study, called the alpha magnetic spectrometer, is planned that would, among other things, advance our capability of detecting very distant antimatter dominated regions.[5]
another possibility is that antimatter dominated regions exist within the universe, but outside our observable universe. inflationary cosmology models suggest that there may be more to the universe than can be seen from the earth, if only for the simple reason that the universe isn't old enough for light from the most distant parts of the universe to have reached us yet. if so, radiation from the boundary of matter and antimatter dominated regions may simply still "be on its way" to earth, and so cannot be observed.
yet another possibility is that antimatter repels ordinary matter rather than attracting it gravitationally, this would prevent observable interactions, see motivations for antigravity. however it appears more likely that matter and antimatter attract each other gravitationally, seeantimatter gravity debate.
[edit]electron dipole moment
there is a theory which suggests the existence of a dipole moment in electrons which would result in an unequal distribution of the electron's negative charge. such a property would allow matter and antimatter to decay at different rates. a new ceramic material, called europium barium titanate, was created to test this theory, with experiments being underway as of 2010.[6]"

-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/antimatter

Sammy
10-24-2011, 08:09 PM
wow! that sounds like quite an undertaking. im curious as to what they find out with that pottery.

matter and anti-matter do seem to complement/attract eachother. thats kind of what i was meaning with the description of atmosphere to ground. its layers but not solid ones. they kind of play with each other creating levels of density (mountains to chasms), and not just dense mass.

maybe the - actualy effects dense matter most (more effective with the dense mass, maybe even a source for magnetism), and the + matter effects the space most (more effective pushing out as a gas).

Sammy
10-25-2011, 06:02 AM
i might be making this more complex than it needs to be. what i was basicly picturing was 1 collection of mass and one collection of space/anti-matter, without any movement. cause acceleration with 1 unit of that mass, and it moves to take the place of 1 unit of anti-matter/space. that space cant just dissapear, so it takes the place of where that accelerated mass once was. simple math, take something from one side you have to add it to the other (neither created nor destroyed).

one odd thing is that happens when space does this switcheroo, it then becomes a distance and no longer a whole of space. instead of seeing nothing but the vast darkness, you can look back and use it to see where you started and how far youve gone.

Jeia Ra Manuk
10-27-2011, 11:19 AM
found this in a thread on avalon and it resonated with me so well; that i just have to share it here with all of you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ex283trhbge

and my little cmnt about it was:
that's not a theory; at least the first part is completely true and provable! we don't take under consideration the fact that the sun is also on an orbit relative to the center of the galaxy as all other stars in our galaxy; and the galaxies are also on orbits moving through space relative to the group of galaxies and so on! like a watch with all of its gadgets moving! and yes the proper way to describe this you need to take under the consideration the spiral nature of all in the universe!

Laggmonster123
11-08-2011, 09:24 AM
first post on these forums. i'm not at the peak of my lucidity at the moment, but i feel a strong push to share some observations.

first off, i am not attempting to refute or in any way argue with what others have carefully researched, but rather am sharing some personal observations. according to kozyrev's work, the weight of a given object can vary temporarily due to altering its physical state in some way.

"though it would seem impossible to most people, kozyrev showed that by shaking, spinning, heating, cooling, vibrating or breaking physical objects, their weight can be increased or decreased by subtle but definite amounts. and this is but one aspect of his amazing work."
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/articles/334-kozyrev-aether-time-and-torsion .

gravity has been described by some as the result of aetheric flow into the earth, however if the concentrations of aether within an object can affect its relative weight, then perhaps we can draw a parallel with a hot air balloon. vibrating a physical object, or even the vibrations associated with a physical object's existence within higher and lower dimensions, could affect not only its aetheric concentrations but that of the aether surrounding it, with the accompanying drop offs at certain harmonics according to some texts. the air molecules within a hot air balloon are vibrating in such a way that the air density is altered relative to the surrounding air and thus becomes buoyant. likewise could we assume that, while there is in fact an aetheric flow into the earth, that the primary cause of the effect we recognize as gravity is actually buoyancy as a result of the variations in aetheric density / concentrations around a physical object, more specifically the earth?

tesla felt a "pressure" sensation during some tests. the great builders of centuries past used audio harmonics to cause items to become almost weightless so that great stones could be moved (http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/articles/336-new-philadelphia-experiment-revelations-part-ii). there are regions of the earth where gravity has been observed to pull things uphill, and the "up" part of that was confirmed through satellite gps, but without any strong electrical voltages observed in flight devices. also, while the aetheric flows and such do vary in higher and lower aspects of our own perceived 3 dimensions, it would seem to me, in my opinion, that tesla's projected energy tests, done over great distances, would have been affected by such a strong aetheric flow into the earth, causing the projected energies to follow an arch instead of straight lines, unless i missed some piece of information. and lastly, it may shed some light on the odd behavior of celestial bodies in relation to dark matter and anit-matter, as the aetheric concentrations in "space" could vary enough to cause this buoyancy effect to vary significantly, and thus help explain why something moves in an odd manner.

one other thing also, in response to the search for monopoles. the existence of a monopole in magnetism is still fascinating, but may i lead some to look into placing the magnets at angles, instead of modifying them while sitting neatly across from each other. the world tends to move in circles, and circles could be associated with angular movement. if one sprays a water hose at a bicycle wheel at an angle, the wheel spins, an angled push and a circular movement.

any corrections or observations are welcome.

loveis8hertz
11-16-2011, 09:28 AM
~
walter russell (1871-1963).the man who tapped the secrets of the universe.


god is all that is, the stillness in one.
matter is the product of the universal mind of god; electro-magnetic oscillation of thinking mind.
matter is energy in motion, oscillation/vibrating vortex from rest to polarity. separation from one.


about electricity
electricity is the strain or tension set up by the two opposing desires of universal mind thinking: the desire for balanced action and the desire for rest.
this electric universe is a complexity of strains caused by the interaction of these two opposing, interchanging electric desires.
all matter is electric. all matter is conditioned into greater or lesser strains according to the intensity of desire which is the cause of all electric strain to which it is subjected.
the farther removed from rest, the greater the strain or tension. that which we call high electric potential is merely great strain to maintain a condition which is far from the condition of rest.
this whole electric universe is a complex maze of similar tensions. every particle of matter in the universe is separated from its condition of oneness, just as the return ball is separated from the hand, and each is connected with the other one by an electric thread of light which measures the tension of that separateness.


about weight
weight is a measure of unbalance. it indicates the intensity of desire of any mass which is out of balance to find balance.
every mass in the universe has its proper potential position. every mass will find that position if not prevented from doing so by the bindings of other masses.
weight should be measured dually as temperature is. it should have an above and a below zero to measure the intensity of desire in masses to rise from the earth as well as to fall toward it.
weight is matter out of place
all matter is a record of its potential at the place of its birth in its wave. masses of matter, like buoys floating in the ocean to mark courses for ships, are floating in space to register the electric potential of the position of their birth.
whenever matter is in the place of its birth, it belongs there. it is, therefore, in balance. it floats in its balanced field. in that position it is weightless in respect to anything else in the universe. whenever it is taken from its field center, or becomes an eccentric part of another field, it is out of balance with the two forces acting upon it. it then has weight, and the measure of that weight is the measure of its unbalance with its out-of-place environment.
weight of matter and measure of electric potential are one and the same thing.


gravity and radiation
large scale examples of this process can be seen in any of the spiral nebulae, notably nebula 74 piscium. two fiery spiral arms of radiation mother-light reach out from the equator of its central sun to born its countless other suns and earths by unfolding them from its centering seed.
http://www.walter-russell.de/illustrationen/diagramme/thumbs/russell_038.gif
two black arms of gravitating father-light pull spirally inward from the heavens toward the poles of the centering giant sun to generate the sun in incandescent oneness of all form.
gravitation is the male principle of creation. gravity refolds toward the seed.
radiation is the female principle of creation. radiation unfolds from the seed.
the generating light of gravitation and the degenerative light of radiation are projected through each other from rest to rest in pulsing sequences to manifest idea by borning father-mother forms of idea through their voiding interchange. this principle of rhythmic balanced interchange between father-mother lights of gravitation and radiation is fundamental in all creating things.
it is the principle of two-way equal giving which manifests the quality of love in the light of the [color=green]one.

http://www.walter-russell.de/en/naturwissenschaft.php


;d the two videos below show energy in motion: oscillation electro-magnetic vortex. 2d wave or 3d spiral.


conical motion 3 - walter russell (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crh2atiq_v4#)

A432
11-17-2011, 10:43 AM
i saw the explanation of gravity on the pbs series "the fabric of the cosmos". brian greene has helped me get a better grasp of many things. last night's program gave a better idea what a quantum computer can do. it makes sense to me now that a quantum computer can find a solution to a problem by simultaneously processing all the possible variables. a practical application would be more accurate storm prediction . i thought of some other practical uses such as warning surgeons of possible problems before they arise. i like what marko rodin says - that the binary system needs to be changed because zero is not a number. he speaks of using 6 numbers for supercomputers: 1, 2, 4, 5, ,7, and 8 - the 6 numbers which belong to the physical world - creating the hexagon. 3, 6, and 9, belong to the aetheron filed (the source field).

regarding gravity though, i still can't relate to the gravity model of objects creating dimples in a 2d space-time fabric. isn't space in 3d? the trampoline model is in 2d. with the 2d model, what if you looked at the sun, for example, from another angle, where would the dimple in space-time be? is it a different 2d slice of space-time at another angle? how many 2d slices does it take to make up 3d? similarly we're always shown earth from the same angle in diagrams. north is always pointing up and at an angle to show the tilt of the axis. what if you approached earth from another direction and south was pointing up? how would the 2d model show the dimple in space-time in that case?

i was wondering if anyone had a response to this? it seems like gravity would hug an object from all directions and would be curving and coiling. i'm looking forward to getting into the nassim harramein material when i finish sfi and the vortex based mathematics courses online.

in love and light everyone

Apophis
11-18-2011, 02:24 AM
i was wondering if anyone had a response to this? it seems like gravity would hug an object from all directions and would be curving and coiling. i'm looking forward to getting into the nassim harramein material when i finish sfi and the vortex based mathematics courses online.

ya nassim has some great concepts for you!
also you can find the video 'thrive' this actually has nassim as one of the speakers, and it's right in line with your question.