View Full Version : 34560 ratio
Steve VanKast
11-21-2004, 08:58 AM
i am reading the divine cosmos again and i am confused about the 34560
ratio. in the book it claims there is a 34560 ratio between the "average"
speed of light and the average speed of sound. it also claimed the ratio
worked with other phenomina but that one seemed the easiest to verify.
i googled up the speed of light and sound (thru air) and tried this on my
calculator and no matter how i compute it, i can't even get it to come
close.
why not?
are there any url's that might help explain practical math application of
the 34560 ratio?
wubby gump
11-21-2004, 05:25 PM
"are there any url's that might help explain practical
math application of the 34560 ratio?"
i don't know how "practical" this site is, it's pretty
thick, but you're willing to give it a shot, as am i
right now.
http://rgrace.org/146/156alawmagic.html
and while this may not give you a practical math
application for what you seek, it does show a
correlation of david wilcock's work with geometry &
its relationship to sound & the 34560
principle.....pretty neat! (scroll down & look at the
chartres labyrinth)
http://www.lambdoma.com/faqs2.html
and one last one. i'm not sure how i stumbled on this,
but this is now on my browser's toolbar. i love it
because of it's depth & endless links within the
articles themselves, and if you "disagree" with
something, you can submit an edit to the material
(with bibliographies, of course) & it can be corrected
in a very timely manner! i'd love to see some of the
members in this forum contribute to it.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/main_page
to quote our buddy wesley clark, "it's all about the
math....."
greetings to one & i all, i hope this finds you all
well.
~ thomas
__________________________________
do you yahoo!?
the all-new my yahoo! - get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
Leslie Tenold
11-21-2004, 06:49 PM
i have just finished reading the shift of the ages which i downloaded from the
ascension2000.com web site. perhaps 400+ pages of excellent reading and just
what you want. les
www.healingangels.net
from: wubby gump
"are there any url's that might help explain practical
math application of the 34560 ratio?"
Steve VanKast
12-03-2004, 09:04 AM
1/3 has always been the magic number to me... while one can fold spindle or
mutilate almost any shape of any known dimension into perfect halves
quarters... even a triangle is nearly impossible to divide into thirds... be
it mathematically or physically... fold a piece of paper into 1/3'ds and
there is always some left over... it is in these leftovers that life and
consciousness somehow seems to evolve.
David Gray
12-04-2004, 07:02 PM
i noted some others have worked with the number so i have added my bit.
starting at the earth's radius.
scales of magnitude
multiply 34560
subatomic not included to plank length
1 1.067 fermi
2 3.09 angstrom
3 10.67 microns
4 369 meters \ 34560
5 12756 kilometers x 34560 (start earth radius )
6 2.94 au x 34560
7 101,884 au x 34560
8 55,655 light years x 34560
9 1.9 billion light years x 34560
10 65,664,000,000,000 trillion total unknown universe
below i have added some of tomes work
l&l
david gray
davidgry@melbpc,org.au
"miraculously, tomes discovered that the average distances between all of these
spherical energy formations at each size level in the universe are precisely
interconnected by a single musical ratio - 34560.
- if we take the average distance between moons and multiply it by a
factor of 34560, we get the average distance between planets.
- take the average distance between planets, multiply it by a factor of
34560 and we get the average distance between stars.
- multiply the average distance between stars by a factor of 34560 and
we get the average distance between galaxies.
- take the average distance between galaxies, multiply it by a factor of
34560 and we get the size of the known universe.
this suggests that there is a "fractal" organization to the cosmos, meaning that
we have what is referred to as "self-similarity on all levels." the geometric
formations created by fractal mathematics can be magnified exponentially, and no
matter how deeply you "zoom in" to the formation, you still see the same
geometric structures. many "chaos" theorists have already discerned that the
universe itself appears to work according to such logic in many different and
mysterious ways.
surprisingly, as we can see from the next chart, this same exact harmonic ratio
of 34560 for the cosmos can be compressed as well as expanded:
- compress the average distance between moons by two factors of 34560,
and we get the average distance between cells, either plant or animal.
- compress the average distance between cells by 34560 and we get the
average distance between atoms.
- compress the average distance between atoms by 34560 and we get the
average distance between nucleons, which are the smallest natural "particles" in
the universe."
[non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Steve VanKast
12-05-2004, 09:32 AM
in step 5 you gave the earth's radius as 12756 kilometers x 34560
(start earth radius )
i think you have radius and diamater confused according to google
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22radius+of+the+earth%22 (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22radius+of+the+earth%22)
the earth's radius should be 6,374 kilometers
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.