PDA

View Full Version : Re-election of Belial



amilius2001
11-04-2004, 12:20 PM
events of the past few days are very relevant to the wilcock
material and the prior cayce readings, though only nominally to
the ra readings. in meditation this morning i realized that the
name belial was a reference to enervating intention by specific
individuals and not the specific individuals in the cayce
readings. it is described as the aberration of the law of one for
the purpose of self-aggrandizement and control. understanding
that no one is deceived or manipulated into an experience
without having chosen it at a spiritual level, disingenuous
leaders use lies and deception with the consent of the
misinformed governed to make choices for others that they
would not choose for themselves. this enervates potential
rather than energizing it. bush the lesser has sold america a
slate of fear. america has been told it has the power to turn back
unwelcome, fearful changes and evolution in the name of a god
that cannot be comprehended. it has been told to overlook that
we attract what we fear. it has been framed in the concept of
worshipping a graciously organized design that pairs 'good' and
'evil' as opposites, which they are not. the opposite of 'evil' is
'gracious'. the infinite creator is a graciously organized design
of conscious energy. there is nothing gracious in the
misinformed opposition of good and evil, as we are being
reminded by current events. fear disempowers good
stewardship by disconnecting the relationship between choice
and consequence. we are again playing with microwaves and
limited nukes in the belief we might share consequence with
others that we would not choose for ourselves. consequences
are in the forming stage. keep your eyes on the red states.
cayce wrote that the first destruction broke the old continent into
a group of large islands through the abuse of such toys of
power. ever notice how the red/blue state maps resemble the
hopi and scanlon maps of tomorrow? might they have
misunderstood that blue does not mean underwater or that red
does not mean inhabitable? we are all one creative conscious
energy that is love at play with itself in the realization of
graciously organized design being self aware.

lealdragon
11-04-2004, 05:14 PM
very good points, but i take exception to the dividing of the country
into red and blue states. i happen to live in a red state and i will
tell you that there are alot of like-minded people (blue-state type)
here - even the polls and the votes show that even in red states,
they were almost evenly divided. so red state just means that they
have just a few more than half 'red' people - certainly not a
majority! i am one of the blue people in a red state and do not want
to be counted as 'red'.

i don't think we can divide ourselves geographically like that.