Free will | Was: (I forgive RA)

[Tony P.]

i'm replying specifically to the below. this caught my attention, and
that's why i'm replying to the concept of putting love vibrations
into water at the supermarket. in my honest reaction, that seems
quite negative, to put love vibrations into water (assumingly water
bottles and such) at the supermarket. i mean, one, it's the store's
property technically, and wouldn't it be infringing on their goods?
two, the consumer doesn't know that love vibrations was put into it.

by the way, what i said above may not be how i feel later on. don't
know why, but i'm seem to be having a bit of bad luck lately. it's
kind of weird.


> well, the thread we are now wrapping up regarding the free-will
considerations of putting love vibrations into water at the
supermarket got me thinking about how difficult these free-will
questions are. i mean, we had a great discussion with quite a few

[OzarkMark]

hi tony,


> i'm replying specifically to the below. this caught my attention, and
> that's why i'm replying to the concept of putting love vibrations
> into water at the supermarket. in my honest reaction, that seems
> quite negative, to put love vibrations into water (assumingly water
> bottles and such) at the supermarket.

this has been a tough one. both sides have good points. i'm not sure,
myself!

> i mean, one, it's the store's
> property technically, and wouldn't it be infringing on their goods?

well, technically, who owns the life-blood of gaia??

> two, the consumer doesn't know that love vibrations was put into it.
>
> by the way, what i said above may not be how i feel later on.

good! shows you have a flexible mind.

> don't
> know why, but i'm seem to be having a bit of bad luck lately. it's
> kind of weird.

hang in there tony! must be some learning to do if the same lesson keeps
coming back. keep posting! love, mark

[darktemplarssj]

> > i'm replying specifically to the below. this caught my
attention, and
> > that's why i'm replying to the concept of putting love vibrations
> > into water at the supermarket. in my honest reaction, that seems
> > quite negative, to put love vibrations into water (assumingly
water
> > bottles and such) at the supermarket.
>

well we already are constantly effected by many things we don't know
about/think about. i mean so many things go right through our mind
into our subconcious. one example would be commercials. now
commercials are a bit of a control system but they also are
educational. i think the baseline is that any manner whatso ever of
abridging free will is a negative act. i think energy is best left
to interact with those that you know. maybe if you were charging
church water with positive vibrations or homeless shelters with
these vibrations it would be good and net you some polarity but i
think a place like a supermarket would loose you polarity because
less than 1/2 of the people who go there aren't spirituality
seeking/spiritually needy. but i didn't spend the time to read the
thread, just commenting on this post.
good journey
-dave

[Unknown]

my 0.50 eurocent on putting love in to water:

i don't think there is anything wrong with putting love in water
bottles or just radiating love to people or to the universe.
in my view it's kind of what 4d 5d 6d beings not incarnated that are
helping earth at this time are doing. they send love and light to
everybody but if they don't want it it won't do much.
but if they are asking for it then it will help them on their search
whatever they are searching.
putting love into water = loving gaia it's water pour moi

peace and love
Unknown