E=mc²

[Tony P.]

if distance and time are said to not exist, and only exist in our
illusion, what does that say about c, the speed of light, which
contains distance over time.

it is also said by some that the speed of light and gravity are
essentially the same thing. that when 4d comes around, the arguement
over the speed of light will be moot, and all there is in 4d is
present and gravity.

if it's true that the velocity of light and gravity are the same
thing, couldn't we simply take velocity of light (in grid lines per
second or whatever) and divide it by the velocity of gravity (in grid
lines per second or whatever)? we'd get something like c=xg where x
is a large number, whatever resulted from velocity of light in
gridlines/sec divided by velocity of gravity gridlines/sec.

then couldn't we convert e=mcãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚ â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â² to e=m(xg)ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã ‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â²? and there was an article
once i think i got in my physics class about how some people created
something that made a bowling ball lighter. it was like antigravity i
guess. the made it lighter in the sense i guess they don't nearly
have the power to levitate it so there's a visible difference between
the plate or whatever and the bowling ball.

am i correct on any of this, or am i way off and confused?