Confused over something about Great Pyramid and how it was built

[Tony P.]

first thing, i'd like to say how i try researching on my own by
reading different things on the internet, order books and read them,
and try tying things together, but still considering what is false
and what is true. well, when i get two or three different sources,
and 99% of the material ties together, but they have material that
clashes or doesn't go together, it creates a problem. now, i can pick
which one i want to believe, but then that isn't a very good idea.
cause the one i decide to consider false, what about all that info on
that book was tied in with the other one i chose as truth? now, some
can say that someone copied other people's information and added fake
stuff to it, but that isn't always the case. both clashing bits of
information seem to have some significance to it.
what i am talking about is what ra said about how the great pyramid
of giza was built (by constructing it in time/space for 100 years and
making it appear in space/time), and what mcmoneagle said in his
book "the ultimate time machine". now, mcmoneagle's book explained it
by a method that would work for the other pyramids that were
essentially done in vein to copy the great pyramid, but i've e-mailed
mcmoneagle and he says it still refers to the great pyramid. he says
something about 17,000 years ago or so at the least he remote viewed.
now, this is interesting, since i think it matches the timewave zero
graph in dating. if anyone has read mcmoneagle's book and the ra
material, i'd appreciate what your opinion is on this. i think there
are facts left out somewhere, that can make those clashing things
listed in both books, fit together somehow.
now, i remember reading something about time/space, and it got my
thinking. if the pyramid was constructed in time/space, what did it
look like there to the observer, and not the builder, as it was being
built in time/space? maybe this could be the missing key. by the way,
mcmoneagle's stuff ties in with d. connaon's nostradamus stuff which
ties in with the ra material essentially.
and i don't want this subject just brushed over, ignored, just
forgotten about. i want to know what is going on, if someone is lying
somewhere, or if there is confusion over something. i just don't want
to guess or believe one thing, i want the truth in the matter. i
really don't want this post just read and just sit with no replies
because no one cares. maybe david wilcock can answer some of these
questions. maybe a channeling can be done to ra asking why mcmoneagle
said what he said about the great pyramid.

[David Wilcock]

from: "tony p."

dw: tony, it is already well known here that carla's only noticeable mistake
in any of the ra sessions was an inaccurate date on the gp. you have most
sources pointing at about 12,500 years ago. this includes the physical
conjunction of the pyramids with the belt star of orion via precession, from
bauval, as well as an edgar cayce reading that put it at 12,500 to 12,450
years ago.

elsewhere in the ra sessions they say that they last contacted the
atlanteans some 11,000 years ago, and then again in around 2100 bc. but then
later they correct the 2100 date back by another thousand years. time is one
of the most difficult things to nail down. hence ra says that to focus too
much on the specific information is transient. their physics model is very
solid, and that's where the bulk of my books rest.

peace be with you -

- david

[Tony P.]

well, it's just confusing reading what joseph mcmoneagle wrote about
how they were built cause everything else in the book seems true.
even something mcmoneagle said in the book matches what the ra
material would agree with. i can't paraphrase easily what he said,
but it was something about i think the creator or a sub-logoi and
colors/light itself. the pulse. maybe both are 100% right, and there
is just a missing fragment that would make this all make sense. and
who says that a negative entity didn't interfere with mcmoneagle's
remote viewing once out of the whole time. cause if i choose to
believe one over the other, that is really a negative effect on my
outlook at life that could change my pathway in life.


--- in asc2k@y..., "david wilcock" <david@a...> wrote:
> from: "tony p."
>
> dw: tony, it is already well known here that carla's only
noticeable mistake
> in any of the ra sessions was an inaccurate date on the gp. you
have most
> sources pointing at about 12,500 years ago. this includes the
physical
> conjunction of the pyramids with the belt star of orion via
precession, from
> bauval, as well as an edgar cayce reading that put it at 12,500 to
12,450
> years ago.