PDA

View Full Version : Ron Paul an enlighted being



dariusdjc
11-07-2007, 01:01 PM
not sure if this is appropriate, i just thought it to be a bit interesting. i was thinking about ron paul the other day and about the amount of money he was able to raise in his 24 hour internet fund raiser. it seemed extremely successful and now he is getting more notoriety on tv.

it is ironic that ron paul's fund raising took place on the fifth of november and ended on november 6 2007. i thought it was very intriguing how he chose this date as it revolves around a theme on the movie v for vendetta. remember, remember the 5th of november?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/11/ron-pauls-gunpo.html

many are aware of all the articles about the 11 number and synchronicity.

ron paul manages to make his announcement of a presidential running on what date??? january 11, 2007 :) the 11th day of the first month.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/local/stories/011207dntswpaul.2114595.html

and what month did his internet fund raising take place? november, the month of 11 :) so he did his online fund raising on 11-05-2007 for 24 hours.

the fund raising officially ended on 11-06-2007 in the morning
and his interest for running for president was announced on 01-11-2007

so we got two 11's is there another 11 somewhere? yep there sure is!!!

now for the fun part!

11+06+2007 = 17
01+11+2007 = 12

adding the top 2 resulting numbers from their dates
what is 17+12 ??? = 29

adding the final resulting 2 numbers
what is 9+2 ??? = ?

yep, you got it 11

that was fun. dunno if the number 11 can be found elsewhere with things related to ron paul, but just thought this small tid bit interesting and wanted to share :)

nem338nem
11-08-2007, 07:29 PM
i kave supported ron paul totally from his inception. notice if did 11.11.11.11 listed on the day of his nov. 5 fundraiser. furthermore, i have just been waiting for someone to post ron pauk on this site, so as to respond. there is something much deeper taking place here (field of consciosness) making people aware and awakening. i know that david senses this as well! i spend a muktitude of hours examining the ron paul campaign. he is a ghandi, i assure you! but the point is not political, it is similar to the postimg that someone did regarding "either reacting to current world events or not" and how ra would respond. the choice is yours : i personally meditate and put all of my will toward his divine actions, truth cannot be denied and we must forgive those that do not accept the light , for it shall be eventually reflected upon them. that is what the negative elite are essentially doing. rflecting our shadow upon us. wake up make a choice!

p.s: i love ron paul!

nelson

FooSnik
11-09-2007, 03:19 PM
his birthday is august 20, 1935. if you add this up you get 1. it is not an 11 but it is half of an 11. :p what the number 1 means, in numerology, is leadership and independence. ones are not afraid to stand all alone on their own merits which is exactly what ron paul is doing. he is going against 77% of his own party. there is another good synchronistic number for you!

he got my attention when i heard the other republican candidates were trying to have him barred from the debates. so i went to youtube and watched some of the debates that he has been in and i was blown away. i got goosebumps and the hair stood up on my skin. he reminds me of a ghandi or an abraham lincoln as well.

there is no doubt in my mind that he is a wanderer!!!

meganarline
11-09-2007, 09:16 PM
i am glad to see a post on ron paul. it is so refreshing to listen to him speak. a politician i actually agree with!!!!!!!!!! i am paying a whole lot more attention to american politics lately and am even wondering if i am allowed to donate a small amount to his campaign (since i am canadian??).

this is another sign to me that the world is waking up.
megan

Mozart
11-10-2007, 09:09 AM
...stuff about ron paul posted here! and the fascinating numerology of his awesome campaign. cool.


back in my libertarian days in the early 80's, when i helped the libertarian presidential candidate run for office, we often spoke highly of ron paul, but we also despaired that he would not "ever" win, if he ran for the presidency...but that was then, at a time when the deficiencies of big gov't were not yet fully apparent to the masses.


those deficiencies are very apparent now, hence his popularity and i couldn't be more pleased. thank god for ron paul being here now.


another interesting thing about the 11's related to ron paul, he is doing a second-round fund-raising on nov 11th (11/11/07...add those numbers up and it's...11!) of next week and i definitely plan on sending in some of my money, now that i just now finally got some money coming in.


i strongly encourage you to donate on the 11th, as i will.


the first day, the 5th of nov, he raised a record $4.2 million in 24 hours; only that war-lover hilary clinton had raised more with a $6.2 million haul, mostly from corporate donors, as compared to paul's haul with 22,000+ people behind it with an average donation of $103 on that one day, the 5th of nov.


i think that the chinese secret society specified that paul is not to be assassinated and i agree with that.


huge obstacles still remain, however, primarily with the primaries being closed, with many, many precincts still being run by those %^&*! vote-changing computers and many evil people in place to distort the elections on the local, state and national levels. many delegates have been chosen to go to political events to vote-in their respective candidates for the nominations of the respective parties and, already, all ron paul supporters have been banned, so there's another obstacle.


the only way that i can see ron paul winning not only the nomination, but the final election itself, is to be such a huge, overwhelming favorite that no amount of election shenanigans could change the reality that paul would win in a transparent election.


but look at what happened in mexico with amlo obviously winning the election, yet the corporate-favored dude got in, despite millions of people taking to the streets with numerous violent clashes with the police state with 1,000's of people being killed. what is it going to take to ensure ron paul leading our massively-distorted country? i dunno.


those chinese assassins...they better hurry up and do their job. i don't yet see any meaningful change going on in the upper levels of gov't in our country.

FooSnik
11-10-2007, 06:22 PM
here are some keywords describing what the number eleven represents in numerology: illumination, spiritual truth, spiritual messenger, pearl of wisdom, idealistic, intuitive, considerate, tolerant, accepting, steadfast.

i have become a bit discouraged because i have found that nobody has heard of him. i work in a large, busy restaurant in an affluent part of washington dc, exactly the sort of place you would think people would be right on top of this sort of thing and it has been sorely disappointing for me to find out that people are not aware of him. and another obstacle is the fact that he is a republican. most of the people who would vote for someone like him are registered as a democrat or independent, neither of which can vote for ron paul in the primaries. but that has not stopped me from registering myself as republican this year so that i can vote for him in the primaries.

meganarline
11-10-2007, 10:00 PM
keep the faith foosnik!! he was on the front page of the new york times today and his funding is almost at $8,000,000.00 so he will be able to get the word out via tv and print ads etc.

a lot of people don't read the alternate news, but once they hear his message i'm sure they will be all over it.

there are a lot of people out there (just look at the number of donations) who are passionate about this. i can see the snowball effect happening already.

although i am not american, i knew as soon as i heard him speak that if i could vote i would vote for him. a lot of people are apathetic because they haven't yet heard of him and think their only choices are non chooseable and they vote for a "political party" as opposed to a person, or they don't vote at all.

i don't understand the whole system in the states, and i don't underestimate his competitors or their "backers", but if everyone who can registers as a republican and votes in the primaries it'll be huge.

it is already a revolution!!!

love,
megan

[note from moderator: just to remind everyone that we want to stick to the numerology synchronicity that started this thread and not turn it into a campaign for this individual]

nem338nem
11-11-2007, 08:21 AM
always remember that ra mention the law of squares, in terms of consciensness awakening. ron paul is most definitly a messenger to awaken the masses. he will win!

go ron "ghandi" paul !

SuperManny
11-11-2007, 11:33 AM
i took my computer in to the shop and while i was looking for a place to park, i saw, a sign that said 'ron paul for president'. my wife went to the local farmer's market, and saw a booth for ron paul supporters. so it seems his name is getting out, at least in this area.

i don't know how the number 11 is significant, because all the numerology that i have studied used single digit numbers. that would make paul a 2. btw the value of ron is also 2, which is described as...
"a spiritual quality in your makeup allowing you to be one of the peacemakers in society... strengths come from an ability to listen and absorb... a fixer, a mediator, very diplomatic type using persuasive skills rather than forcefulness to make their way in the world.

negative side of the 2, nervous energy, may be seen as an extremist who is sometimes the zealot in expressing likes and dislikes. nervous tension can bring the normally easygoing 2 into a state of emotional outrage... can sometimes become oversensitive. in some instances, the strength of the 2 can also become its weakness. twos often struggle against indecisiveness. there is a tendency for the many 2s to harbor feelings of uneasiness, and dissatisfaction with accomplishments and personal progress in life. the negative 2 can be very pessimistic."

another site i found that does include the number 11, seems to be very similar to the number 2. keywords for #2s: [i]diplomatic, warm, peaceful, sensitive. if expressed negatively: too dependent, manipulative, passive-aggressive. and the keywords for #11: [notice the similarities] idealistic, intuitive, considerate, tolerant, accepting, steadfast. if expressed negatively: too dependent, over-sensitive, manipulative.

we just don't see him in the news much, because the news is mostly sponsored by corporate america and the ron paul hasn't taken money from corporations because he doesn't want to be in their debt, imho.
i believe he'd make an excellent president. :)

alchemikey
11-11-2007, 08:52 PM
that's interesting to see all the number 11 synchronicities with ron paul...i have sort of been waiting to see a ron paul post here too... i can't think of anyone better to lead america towards 2012

it was amazing to see the difference just $100 from a group of supporters could provide and i am glad i took part in it...just to clear something up, the november 5th "money bomb" was a grassroots effort and was not planned by ron paul

there is another "money bomb" in development on december 16th
http://www.teaparty07.com/

all we are asking is give paul a chance :)

peace,
mikey

PriestOfLight
06-12-2009, 05:36 AM
it dawn on me last night that maybe ron paul may also be an enlightened being after reading this...

historic news - dr. paul's audit the fed bill has passed the 218 co-sponsor benchmark, and now sits with 222.

read his congressional press release here.

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/tx14_paul/audit.shtml

everyone keeps talking about how obama is here to help us move through to the new age, but it would seem to me that ron paul is also a driver in the push into the new age of peace. his message streams accross the entire globe. every country knows of him and many like his message.

love and light

priestoflight

aqcheryl
06-14-2009, 04:23 PM
it dawn on me last night that maybe ron paul may also be an enlightened being after reading this...

historic news - dr. paul's audit the fed bill has passed the 218 co-sponsor benchmark, and now sits with 222.

read his congressional press release here.

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/tx14_paul/audit.shtml

everyone keeps talking about how obama is here to help us move through to the new age, but it would seem to me that ron paul is also a driver in the push into the new age of peace. his message streams accross the entire globe. every country knows of him and many like his message.

love and light

priestoflight


i have noticed this before, when i first heard of him.

Stephen
06-15-2009, 10:00 AM
it is ironic that ron paul's fund raising took place on the fifth of november and ended on november 6 2007. i thought it was very intriguing how he chose this date as it revolves around a theme on the movie v for vendetta. remember, remember the 5th of november? his supporters actually planned that date for that very reason.


many are aware of all the articles about the 11 number and synchronicity.

i think you're taking the number thing a little too far. i personally don't think it's synchronicity when you're taking that many filtered steps in order to reach the conclusion of eleven. also, remember, that synchronicity is very personal. the phenomenon can appear in many different ways that aren't just numbers.

regardless, i am a strong supporter of ron paul and suspect he's an extremely smart & enlightened guy.

Stephen
06-15-2009, 10:02 AM
everyone keeps talking about how obama is here to help us move through to the new age, but it would seem to me that ron paul is also a driver in the push into the new age of peace. his message streams accross the entire globe. every country knows of him and many like his message.

in my opinion, paul certainly strives to protect liberty more so than obama. i think obama is a genuine person with good intentions, however, the philosophy of self-governance seems to be increasingly more important these days.

Sarahmay
06-15-2009, 02:39 PM
so ron paul supporters, tell me this: how do you reconcile his fundamentalist christian beliefs, that the earth is only 10,000 years old, and that he does not support separation between church and state? and would completely outlaw abortion.

sorry, i just can't get past these issues. i'm all for getting rid of the federal reserve, but not to lose my civil rights.

Sammy Six String
06-16-2009, 09:47 AM
enlightenment is such a personal thing. one can find enlightenment and then forget as conditioning takes back over. one can refind enlightement... and there are others that can live in it continuously. politics is a nasty game set firmly in duality. with duality, comes judgement. just like with anyone, i can like some of the things one talks about, but usually not everything. does that make the person less enlightened and me more? no... it's just an awareness thing. truth be told, everyone is waking up in their own way around the world irregardless of who they are or what they stand for. it's natural for us to take affinity to certain speakers, politicians, actors, athletes, musicians, etc... but let's save the judgement for the "unenlightened." :p

Stephen
06-16-2009, 10:04 AM
so ron paul supporters, tell me this: how do you reconcile his fundamentalist christian beliefs, that the earth is only 10,000 years oldwhat does this have to do with him being a congressional representative or our president?


and that he does not support separation between church and state?do you support separation between church and state? because it seems like you're worried about a presidential candidate's christianity.

regardless, i do not see how dr. paul doesn't support this. he has clearly stated support for the constitution, "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" many times over in public appearances and in his books. states may do as they wish, just as the constitution says they are able.


and would completely outlaw abortion.where, as president, would ron paul have this authority? i challenge you to prove this accusation.

Sarahmay
06-16-2009, 12:03 PM
it is in mainstream media, like wikipedia:

paul calls himself "strongly pro-life", "an unshakable foe of abortion",and believes regulation or ban on medical decisions about maternal or fetal health is "best handled at the state level". he says his years as an obstetrician led him to believe life begins at conception; his pro-life legislation, like the sanctity of life act, is intended to negate roe v. wade and to get "the federal government completely out of the business of regulating state matters." paul also believes that the courts making decisions on behalf of the state against public and private display of christmas referencing the separation of church and state is a war against religion.

there are christians, and then there are christians who want to ram their beliefs down your throat. doesn't sound too enlightened to me. just because this man has railed against the federal reserve and the ptb doesn't make him a savior to me.

Stephen
06-16-2009, 02:08 PM
the sanctity of life act, is intended to negate roe v. wade and to get "the federal government completely out of the business of regulating state matters."

how does this "completely outlaw abortion" as you say? this is the complete opposite of outlaw. his bills are intended to return powers of choice to the fifty states instead of having one blanket federal law.


has railed against the federal reserve and the ptb doesn't make him a savior to me.not sure who called him a savior.

Jetamus
06-17-2009, 02:27 AM
i don't know about enlightened, but he seems to at least be intelligent and willing to stand by his beliefs.

Sarahmay
06-17-2009, 11:46 AM
the bottom line for me is that paul's version of liberty is not as liberating as i would hope in a free society. he wants to limit federal power so the states can follow their worst intincts, like outlawing abortion and eliminate separation of church and state. he has openly stated this, and i can't support those positions. i'm not really sure that his supporters "get" this.

but, i do believe he is a person of honesty and integrity, and i honor him for his courage to speak his beliefs.

aqcheryl
06-19-2009, 05:19 AM
the bottom line for me is that paul's version of liberty is not as liberating as i would hope in a free society. he wants to limit federal power so the states can follow their worst intincts, like outlawing abortion and eliminate separation of church and state. he has openly stated this, and i can't support those positions. i'm not really sure that his supporters "get" this.

but, i do believe he is a person of honesty and integrity, and i honor him for his courage to speak his beliefs.

i see what you are saying, but i think its important to remember that until we all become collective and lose our separation, we will never fully agree on pivotal issues with any leader. its just not going to happen.

the problem with the federal government is that it has become too large - indeed we were never meant to have one at all. the states were ruled by the people, now the feds are in their pockets.

the problem we have today is that the feds have too much power. the states need to retake their power - and this comes down to how states work, and how we monitor our states. it all comes back to the people.

i am definitely pro-choice. i do not believe in democracy, i believe in a republic. in a republic - you make the choices for what youre beliefs are, etc. a democracy is majority rule over minority. this means my neighbors can vote and tell my family what to do and how to live our lives.

for example we have this in california - a prime example of how bad a democracy is. the government should not even be involved in gay marriage and rights. no one should be allowed to tell two gay men who love each other that they cant marry. it doesnt matter how much it goes against their beliefs, its an infringement on anothers will.

its the same with abortion - except that i feel theres a compromise there. theres a point where the life growing inside initially is just a cellular growth, and is nothing. at some point, a soul enters this cellular structure, and if we could discern when that happens, that should be the cut off time for abortions. if you wait that long, you lose your right to abort outside of major medical reasons. that kind of thing. cause technically once a soul enters the body, you have to be concerned with its choice as well. it chose to live in that body. until it goes in there, if we could ever figure that out, im pro-abortion up to that point. to me, that would be an equal compromise, and would help take 'beliefs' out of the picture.

i support ron myself because hes the one i see that is consistent since he joined, in his beliefs. get rid of the fed reserve - its not even a government institution. get rid of the irs (the fr's henchman) because its unconstitutional to make us pay taxes on labor.

i agree with all of that. i also agree with him, when i have see him say fix the dollar. i do not believe getting rid of the dollar is going to save us - it would kill us. i believe we need to stick with the dollar, but print the dollar ourselves based on our treasury, and not allow banks to control it or overprint, or add interest to it.

but theres things i disagree with ron on, but again, i dont hold them against it. he may be against abortion but you know, im not going to condemn the man and judge that he would cross the line and make it illegal against others wishes just because he doesnt believe in it.

i cant shake the feeling though that obama is our last president. i dont know if thats a good thing, or a bad thing. hopefully a good!

Stephen
06-22-2009, 02:00 PM
the bottom line for me is that paul's version of liberty is not as liberating as i would hope in a free society. he wants to limit federal power so the states can follow their worst intincts, like outlawing abortion and eliminate separation of church and state. he has openly stated this, and i can't support those positions. i'm not really sure that his supporters "get" this.

i respect and understand your point of view. my confusion, however, arises out of your belief: when states give up power to the federal government then liberty increases. once the federal government has the power to make their decision on abortion, or any issue, then it is made for all fifty states - no matter which side they take. the federal government could either outlaw abortion for all fifty states, or, permit it for all fifty states.

however, if the states, as they do now for the most part, have the liberty to either permit or outlaw abortion, then the people have the liberty to live in a state that thinks like them. if texas outlaws abortion, then, no big deal. because those who believe in abortion can move to a pro-abortion state and at least the federal government didn't ruin it for everybody. these principles of state's rights are the basic tenet of our federalism.

Sarahmay
06-23-2009, 09:34 AM
these principles of state's rights are the basic tenet of our federalism.


i absolutely understand your reasoning, however many of the states in this country are run by fringe conservative factions that would love to take away the liberties that paul professes to promote. the states are notoriously mismanaged and do not truly represent their constituencies...or they actually do represent their uneducated, fearful constituencies, which is even worse. but then again, i am not a libertarian...someone who want all the benefits of society (roads, infrastructure, laws) but doesn't want to pay for it (taxes).

so i respectfully agree to disagree here.

Stephen
06-23-2009, 10:29 AM
i absolutely understand your reasoning, however many of the states in this country are run by fringe conservative factions that would love to take away the liberties that paul professes to promote. the states are notoriously mismanaged and do not truly represent their constituencies...or they actually do represent their uneducated, fearful constituencies, which is even worse.

i agree with you here. i would also say, however, that the federal government is no better. i personally would rather see states slip under one by one (with a few remaining with liberty) than the federal government ruin it for everyone in one swift sweep.


but then again, i am not a libertarian...someone who want all the benefits of society (roads, infrastructure, laws) but doesn't want to pay for it (taxes).i would disagree with your definition of a libertarian here. most libertarians do indeed want the benefits of roads without paying taxes - however - they would like to see roads in the hands of private industries that they pay for in that manner.

so libertarians still want to pay for roads they use, just not to be forced to pay for them through taxes.


so i respectfully agree to disagree here. :)

[moderator note - intended to gently steer us off the road into general politics and back onto topic; specifically ron paul :)]

Matthew Clark
11-20-2009, 11:00 AM
not sure whether this will be allowed on forum as it is political, but it looks likely the federal reserve is going to be audited.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/panel-votes-to-audit-feds-balance-sheet-2009-11-19?link=mw_related_stories

bout time!

well done ron :)

MarBu13
11-20-2009, 07:12 PM
in my opinion, paul certainly strives to protect liberty more so than obama. i think obama is a genuine person with good intentions, however, the philosophy of self-governance seems to be increasingly more important these days.


it dawn on me last night that maybe ron paul may also be an enlightened being after reading this...

everyone keeps talking about how obama is here to help us move through to the new age, but it would seem to me that ron paul is also a driver in the push into the new age of peace. his message streams accross the entire globe. every country knows of him and many like his message.

love and light

priestoflight


i don't think david ever intended to give the message that barack obama was suppose to be some type of savior riding in on his white horse, coming to save us all from doom and disaster. i look at him and michelle obama with the upmost respect and love and i see them both as enlightened beings coming to give balance to a system that's been mainly corrupt with the negative elite. as with ron paul. it's possible that he as well as hundreds others are allowed to be great people in their own right. striving to do what's best and make change.

i personally think the game of politics is so dishonest, negative and deep that as a whole - it's something that won't change in the matter of moments. which is something anti-obama people seem to be hoping for. i'm glad obama, ron paul and others are helping to change things while we're here, but no matter what happens - we are beyond politics, government and society. we're cosmic beings waiting for a close cosmic event. i don't know about you guys, but that's good enough for me. :cool:


not sure whether this will be allowed on forum as it is political, but it looks likely the federal reserve is going to be audited.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/panel-votes-to-audit-feds-balance-sheet-2009-11-19?link=mw_related_stories

bout time!

well done ron :)

right on top of things as usual, matthew! :p