PDA

View Full Version : wanderer? skeptic? coping skill?



jefferson111
05-21-2008, 12:51 PM
hi all,

let me introduce myself.
i am jefferson. at least that is the avatar i'm using here. i always try to remain as anonymous as possible on the net.
i got into computers and the internet back in 95. i'd avoided them all the way to hs graduation in 88 even though i always heard the mantra "they will run our lives one day". i just couldn't stand them and was afraid then.

well, life sure is funny. i took to the pc and netwroking and the internet like o to the h2.
i work in it nowadays- ever since i quit my regular job back in 98.
anyway, shortly after getting in the it field where i find the time to be on the net for many many hours a day i landed at the enterprise mission.
that was my first serious delving into "wierd" science and reality- outside the box type stuff.

again, i took to that like nobodies business and in the next few years i was hyperlinked to many new and different ideas and thoughts.

then 2001 happened to me...or i to it...not sure but it involved a nasty surprise that precipitated a divorce. during this time, things were so overwhelming that it was obvious, even then in the moment, that i was going through another growth period (not physical- i'm sure everyone here knows what growth i mean).

so there i am suddenly upside down with a 8 month old and a 3 year old. very hard yet at the same time invigorating. (well to be truthful, maybe the invigorating feeling is enhanced by hindsite).
it was during this time- say 2001-3.5- that i had much alone time that i spent soul searching etc. etc. and my readings, both online and from amazon
expanded immesly from say crop circles, to hermeticism, to the wave, to wilcock, hoagland (still at that time), jm jenkins,goro aduchi,anomalies.net, etc. etc. ad nauseum until it seemed i had my fill.

it just occurred to me one day that i hadn't been to any of "my" sites as i referred to the "new agey" type sites i had been reading. and so for quite a while i didn't read any of them- mostly cause it seemed i was reading the same old stuff maybe with a slight twist or some new "person on the scene"'s take on someone elses material. this went on for about a year i'd say.

then in late 2004 mom is found to have the fastest cancer tumor one could have in her frontal lobe. lots of hurt, trama, emotional chaos in general follow. she finally passes (in front of me, btw- quite a story in itself, maybe another time if anyone cares to hear it) in 2006.
the last year or so found me getting drawn back into the new age stuff although the flavor is different. by that time the whole bs drama at the anomalies board had happened and hoagland took his board to subscription and that whole scene just went to crap so by 2006 i found that there wasn't a great forum or bbs (if you are old school) going (that i knew/know of) and so it was different stuff that i was reading. this is when i read all of davids stuff for the second time but again, this kind of taperd off as we got to spring 2007.

by then, it seemed goro's site was the only one i had loading daily and yet i had become really irritated with him and his bs way before that- i just felt i had to peek on it once in a while to at least stay in touch with the high wierdness part of life. i finally closed his page in my opera last fall.

this winter though i came back a third time to david's site and once again i started reading whatever appealed at the moment. in all honesty, and this is why we use fake names on the net i guess, i would go to his library and scan titles and click on 3 or 4 that appealed, then skim them real quick to get an even better glimpse and if it was what i was "into" or "feeling" that day, that moment, i printed it and then went downstairs to the "library" (potty break) for 30 minutes. as i seem to be quite regular, this also became regular. then in march we find out dad has pancreatic cancer and 9 months or so to live. wait....i jumped ahead by about a month.

around late january-beginning of february i was really "getting" davids articles a whole lot more- even though for much of it, this was the third reading. things were making more sense and connecting much more. some of that i figure is that since the last two readings, i've read so much more from so many more angles.

so during these 5-6 weeks (late january to 1week of march this year) i was feeling different. i could feel change (for lack of better wording) happening inside me. in many ways i felt like i was in another growth stage like what happened during my rough divorce or moms death/sickness yet things were relatively good and stable. (coincidentaly my sister who i seem to have a very strong/similar connection to/with was ending her marriage 1500 miles away).

there was a particular period of about 10 days in there where i literally was having some good epiphanies. one of which involved me and my ex.
at this time i started talking to my sister for hours at a time and she is like minded she was just good to bounce ideas off and to i guess basically hear my thoughts and tell me, no your not crazy etc.

so march 6th, we find out dad has 9 months. things once again turn down. my sister and i can talk "new agey" and get what and where we are coming from but my other sister and brother aren't so receptive. my close sister and i try to keep each other centered (very hard- especially the last 2 weeks for whatever reason) and help our other tow siblings and dad get through this.

my latest issue though is what got me to register and start this silly long post. and now that i think about it, what i'm about to describe/ask happened and since then, is when things have gotten decidedly harder. what i mean by that is lately i feel so far from center most days that it almost seems like a dream when i was centered and "growing" during february.

the issue is this: i had moved on the science of oneness and was reading it and for whatever reason i wanted to investigate one of david's sources that he was quoting in the book. this led me on a mini 3 or 4 day trip down skeptical lane and what i found, i found to be terribly disheartening.

i found that opposed to what david claims, cayce did indeed have much influence and knowledge about esoterica.
i found many issues with the maharashi effect/results.
there was an author (can't remember his name at the moment) david used several times who when i looked into him is very suspect.
the there's hoagland.
many more i suspect.

now, i know a pure skeptic (a lot of debunking there too) site is kinda like taking the pendulum the complete opposite direction and some salt should be applied but i was seriously shaken.
up to that time, and especially this year, i was really "feeling" what david is saying and then all of a sudden i'm seriously questioning him and the message.
discovering these things reminded me of the book stargate conspiracy, and so i dug that out of a box and started to re- read it. that reminded me of the wierd connections by so many in the new age field and hoagland is a big one.
is david knowingly or unknowingly participating with whomever it is that is coordinating whatever it is thery are doing?

who knows, but what i found more disturbing was the idea that davids whole message is bunk. why would this upset me so much? because i so desperately want it to be true? what does that say about me?

i'm not even considering that there's anything nefarious on david's part. the thing is this: frequently david forms proofs from "supporting" evidence but if that supporting evidence is fake, then so too is davids conclusion.
this disturbs me.


so, being disturbed, i come to the forum here and read and search for a few days.
my overall impression, even though i admit not a lot of time here, is that it's a fanboy forum. no disrespect intended.
i see a lot of believers and supporters and that really doesn't surprise me. it confuses me.


**note**this stuff refers to new age in general and davids material as well


you see, i find myself saying "is there really anything to this stuff or are we all a certain type of person that at this time and place and culture are looking for something (that in the past was provided in large part by religion)?"

iow, is this our new religion?
are we decieving ourselves?


argggg i have so much more rumbling in the head yet no time. i have to go. i'll post this and return to it tomorrow.
thanks for reading/listening and really, no offense intended to anyone.
i'm trying to clear my head yet now it's spinning more....till tomorrow.

jefferson

johnasmodeus
05-21-2008, 08:57 PM
well, to be honest, i have my own issues with some of david's conclusions. but i have issues with everybody's conclusions at some point, so it doesn't bother me. i'm used to being "the smart kid in the room," and maybe because of that i don't feel any need to ascribe complete knowledge and trustworthiness to any one individual and depend on them for accurate information. i just take what seems good and leave the rest.

there have been some constants that i have found i can depend on for the most part: cayce is one of them. ra and ll research rate high on my scale as well. david is good, but he moves so quickly from one topic to the next that it can be difficult to stay with him, and in addition, he deals with human sources that have past or present involvement in government. every human source is a potential channel of disinformation, even if the source himself is unaware of it.

don't let it shake you. you shouldn't be ascribing a very high level of trust to somebody you don't know personally anyway.

FooSnik
05-21-2008, 09:44 PM
i know what you are saying jefferson. these days it is nearly impossible to trust anyone. it seems everyone has their own agenda. you just have to trust your gut.

i will say one thing to you. everyone here encourages each other to be independent and form your own opinions for yourself. i think you are right not to be a lemming and just blindly follow anyone.

all of us just want each other to recognize the god within.

DAB
05-22-2008, 05:57 AM
hi jefferson...how are you?

in my humble opinion you are simply balancing on the fence and contemplating jumping to the ethereal side but are simply at "your" withdrawal stage. meaning you are probably about to withdraw(in your own way) from 3d life as we know it(been taught maliciously) because you feel being within it is without any or little merit. having young children and other personal 3d responsibilities is making it a bit more trepidatious to punch-out of the "bought and sold" reality we have been coerced to live in.
the "new age" you speak about was infiltrated by black ops a very long time ago to make it look mostly like a fairy-tale-woo-woo land full of crack pots and money mongers.
but...3d life as we know it, that we have been abiding by for generations, is in fact full of operatives that "push" conformations to a fairy-tale-woo-woo land full of crack pots and money mongers full of a "service to self" hierarchy...better known as 'living in the material world' !
i think if you look a little closer at some of the posters here you just may find that there are alot of self-responsible, wise, independent, self-less types that take away from the theory that this is a 'fan club'. many here are just now tuning in...but many, many more have been tuned in for some time. soon...tuning in will be what most everyone with good hearts will be doing naturally and exponentially...imho!
and if you listen to more of david's one on one interviews you may just get a feeling and knowing that he is very researched in what he does...and i mean intently/intensively researched. i believe that most all of the rabbit holes you go down to follow up on his research will prove to be as true as the sunlight out your window.

the best to you!

namaste!

Silvanus Sanctus Germanus
05-22-2008, 10:54 AM
hello jefferson, good instincs!

myself, i think free will requires us not to believe in anything 100%. i feel it is extreemly healthy for our spiritual evolution to leave the door wide open for endless possibilities of infinite creation...................sylvain................ ...

vandance22
05-22-2008, 02:32 PM
to me it looks like part of your spiritual development. if you trust anything blindly, it opens an opportunity for negative forces to influence you/it quite easily. no matter how reliable david's information is/has been, the possibility for something negative to happen in him is always there, and we should always be trying to rely on our intuition to guide us.

astraya
05-23-2008, 12:02 PM
hi jefferson,

thanks for being so honest. i've been on this forum for only a month and i'm getting a little frustrated as i wait on my seventh post to be denied.

and the number 8 keeps coming up including that you graduated in '88...the year the olympics were in my hometown. as well as many other threads coming around to the number 8.

today it occurs to me that we can get trapped in 8 spinning our wheels around and around as it is an energy exchange number/moving the energy/taming the energy. as represented in the tarot "strength" the 8th card of the major arcana shows a woman taming a lion which represents kundalini. you could even get trapped in the energy exchange of going back and forth from the source.

i've appreciated many interesting links from david and others on this forum but it does feel a little patriarchal as i mentioned i've already had six posts denied all of which were topics that i strongly feel would "grow" some of the topics that are discussed here. as well, i have the feeling that there are far more male "members" here than female. although a few of the male members graciously represent a balanced male/female perspective.

so as i watch some of these topics spin round-and-round i realize that the other option with the number 8 is to move up an octave.

and right before i was introduced to this forum i had a dream about 11x11 which is 121. after having it confirmed that everyone sees the "stargates" represented by 11:11 the question is what do we do with those stargates? because 1+1+1+1 is 4 which to me represents the trickster and a death of the ego. now i realize that if we have the courage to transform the stargates into 121 what we end up with is the duality enclosed within the ego (represented by 1's). a proliferation instead of an ascension?

so...i will spend my weekend looking after kids & pets and supporting a father-in-law who is sick with pancreatic cancer, a cousin who's going through a divorce and visiting friends who i encourage to allow their children to talk about "aliens" rather than shut their "imaginations" down. maybe that is my next octave?

best wishes,
stacy (my real name)

larissa
05-24-2008, 08:18 AM
hi jefferson. i could relate to your post, although i don't feel critical of anyone on this forum. how important is information when it keeps changing all the time? the information might be relevant at the time, then the next minute it's something completely different. so whether david's facts are true or not is only relevant to the moment i'm hearing them, and how i'm reacting. it's all pieces of the puzzle, and analyzing any of it is crazy making.

i actually feel my way through things rather than think through them. that's how i got through school, since i didn't understand most of what was being taught (some kind of learning disablility) i would feel the correct answers on the multiple choice tests and pretty much get them right. when they did an iq test on me they found it was high, and put me into an accelerated program that i couldn't keep up with.

what i'm trying to say is that's how i approach my attraction or not to whatever individual or idea is sent my way. there's so many out there, and i have my favorites. right now david is my favorite probably because i get extremely excited everytime i hear him speak or read something of his. and i don't even understand a lot of it. it's a feeling i can't properly explain. and visiting this forum gets me going as well. feels like home (for the moment anyway, i tend to move around a lot).

one last thing in regard to sitting on the fence. that's what i did for so many years, allowing the skeptic to emerge rather a lot. then sometime last year i decided enough. no more sitting on the fence. i'm on the side of the crazies. i won't allow the skeptic to control anymore. my discernment is in the area of feeling. and guess what, things took off like nobody's business. the syncronicities increased and now i'm flying instead of slogging. it's great. so, that's my two cents worth.

eyez4096
05-25-2008, 06:54 AM
i absolutely agree with a few aspects of your argument/query. being trained as a mathematician, i'm quite familiar with the concept of proof; and sometimes i'm certain that david doesn't understand this concept. but, i must add to my analysis that it appears most of mainstream scientists (including debunkers) don't "get it" either. take a look at the experiment which "disproved" the concept of an ether about 100 years ago... this flimsy experiment has been used to justify 100 years of similarly flimsy research. it's actually somehow funny.

for many people, "new age" spiritualism has indeed replaced traditional oldschool religion. and this almost always has a decisively negative result. this does not mean that inquiry into the unknown (seeking) is inherently flawed; it means that people within this illusion are inherently flawed. no seeking which involves ra's well-stated teach/learning will be without flaw. but the process itself, without the taint of chimeric results, is a perfect one. by looking at these things which, in many cases, are easier to ignore, we allow ourselves to grow and this is the only truly important part of seeking.

no one -- and i really mean no one -- can realistically claim to have your answer. and anyone who does is lying to you. what david and a few other fringe researchers do have (which most mainstream researchers do not) is a map drawn in various degrees of distortion which serves its role to help you discover (or disprove) these "truths" on your own.

uh oh.. it's sounding like i think i have your answer... well, i'll end this here while it's still just a word-sketched map;)

-charles